That's just it, it is a theory only and there is NO real proof. And every so often they change and adapt things in this theory when some scientific fact or discovery comes along and begins to expose it. People did not come from monkeys. A piece or two pieces of nothing did not explode and create everything. And evolution disproves itself. It teaches that the strongest species survives. So if that is so why is man still here? Man isn't the strongest species, but he does think. But the original theories say the strongest not the one that can think. So as I said it disproves itself. So now the only logical and factual explanation for existence is GOD!!!
2006-06-26 02:46:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Julie 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
There is evidence of evolution but on a much smaller scale than what is presented in the Theory of Evolution. There is no definitave evidence either way. There are many reasons as to why people believe it is true. It depends on your point of view. If you believe in God and the Bible it obviously talks about what is now known as creationism or the belief that God created us from nothing. However there is no definitave proof of that other than the Bible and many believe the Bible is just a book. However there are some who try to combine Evolutionism and Creationism. They believe that the Bible isn't to be taken literally and say that God controlled Evolution and therefore did create us from nothing. Still others wish not to believe in a God, whom they feel is not taking care of us. They argue that if God is how He is represented in the Bible exists, then the world would not be in the state it is. People of Christian faith may well say that this is the work of the devil. There is also one other point I wish to adress as well. You mention that Evolutionism is "theory only" but there are many theories. The thing is that almost nothing can be proven beyond a doubt for the simple fact that anomolies that may throw off data or may not fit into the theory. There are many theories accepted as fact.
2006-06-26 02:44:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by chelath2000 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
A scientific "theory" is NOT a guess or conjecture. In science, a 'theory' is a logical framework of ideas for which there is testable evidence. Hence the 'theory' of gravity. Mistaking scientific theories to be 'guesses' is simply ignorant.
The evidence for evolution is absolutely overwhelming. There are hundreds of books you can consult that address every imaginable objection. But the best evidence is probably that scientists have been trying for more than 100 years to prove evolution wrong, with absolutely no luck. The facts in support of evolution just keep piling up, from fields as different as astronomy and geology to organic chemistry and computer science.
Transitions are not only documented in fossils, but we have witnessed many instances of evolution in the last 100 years: moths, fish, plants, and especially bacteria and viruses (hence antibiotic-resistant bacteria).
2006-06-26 02:48:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Adam D 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution can be divided into two parts, macro and micro. Micro evolution is a fact, where as macro evolution remains a theory due to debates on the exact steps of the evolutionary process. EVOLUTION DID HAPPEN we simply can’t trace the exact evolutionary steps of the of the 3 trillion plus species on earth. Considering there is no way that we can even prove if we have located all the species on earth, this may always remain a theory. We can prove though, beyond a doubt, that humans have evolved. We can trace it back conclusively 3.6 million years. 97% of all scientists accept evolution (so does the Catholic Church). Christians have spread lies about this excessively, they especially like to say evolution preaches that Humans evolved from monkeys. Evolution does not state that humans evolved from monkeys, that idea is completely absurd. Science states that monkeys and humans evolved from a shared forefather and are hence relatives, (all primates are) but we are in no way direct descendants of them.
2006-06-26 02:57:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pure ignorance, wanting to believe in something to prove that there is no God. As for any evidence of any transformation, there is not one shred of any. Some have faked it to try to make you believe there was by putting gorilla skulls with human bones or vice versa but there is no evidence. Funny how some things come from billions of years ago just like they were and some evolved to be something different. If any of it were true, they would have some bones or something of the in-between somewhere but none has ever been found and won't be as there is none.
2006-06-26 02:34:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by ramall1to 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
People are ready to accept it because it's the leading theory. It's almost and probably is, impossible to prove that it's true, however, the majority of evidence available to us points towards that conclusion. Also, there's no rival argument in opposition to it that uses science as it's foundation in the matter. Therefore, it's commonly accepted among scientist.
Curtis
2006-06-26 02:34:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Curtis 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know of no educators who teach Darwinism as fact, or fail to teach the holes in the theory such as the continued existence of an older form and sudden species changes called sports with the old yellow grapefruit there with the pink grapefruit. If you know anyone who accepts it unquestionally, wake them up. It does beat creationism, though.
2006-06-26 02:42:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by ringocox 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a logical theory. It is very plausible, and supported by almost all Scientists.
If there were a better theory to replace it 99.99999999999999999999% of scientist would switch over to that theory.
2006-06-26 02:38:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by plastik 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is based on what can be derived from observable, physical evidence.
If other observable, physical evidence is identified that directs the theory in another direction, then that is the direction it will go.
No, words written on faith are not scientific proof.
2006-06-26 02:40:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by spedusource 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There were those bacteria that adapted to their environment.
Of course, when I moved to Alabama from New York, I also adapted. I have a bit of a drawl in my speech now, and my skin seems to have developed a permanent tan. Evolution?
2006-06-26 02:36:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋