I do not mean that way that "the postmans" suddenly starts screaming...lets pretend that nobody sleeps around...
Do you think it would be easier to get husbands to attend the church regularly?
2006-06-25 20:54:22 · 9 answers · asked by SeeTheLight 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Was not that a thought though!!
Well, I do not know how much that would effect to men wanting to seek God's help...
I love worship...but it really does not have very much to do with delivery and pain. When I moved to the U.S.A...I did not go to church for years..it was my child who wanted to belong to the church. When you go through delivery, you want to do the best possible thing for your child's sake. But that child does not have to be your own...
I think we would still have babies...I am sure that men can endure the pain like somebody is squeesing their " balls " for a minute and then minute rest and squeese again...for hours...
Yep, it is wiser to marry church going man than except non-goer to change habits...
I have been believing Jesus my whole life, but it was my child who introduced the church for me again...
Thank you very much for all answers. This was a silly thing, thank you for playing with me...
2006-06-28 11:34:15 · update #1
Yes i still think we would have babies and we would have men who better appreciated what a woman goes through to conceive a child. Would be nice if they could also experience the nine months of hell or carrying the child as well as the pain of delivery. And if you want a husband to attend church regularly then marry one that already does that.
2006-06-25 21:01:29 · answer #1 · answered by tysha30 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why would the father of a child feeling the pain of delivery cause them to want to go to church? Child delivery is not religious, it's biological. I didn't convert back to Christianity as I delivered my daughter. In fact, the way that Christianity and Judaism teach that the pain of childbirth is due to their God's sick sense of punishment makes me less likely to want to reconvert! How sadistic does that deity have to be, really?
2006-06-26 04:44:46 · answer #2 · answered by Ally 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol... that would b funny. I think we would still have kids. It would also probably make men more appreciative for their children... knowing that they went through so much pain. im not sure what that has to do with church though.
2006-06-26 04:01:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yea we'd still have babies. men don't ***** about the pain and ****, maybe it will encourage people to stop having so many babies. this world is way too overpopulated anyways, whats with religious people thinking we must grow our numbers e ven though its obvious we surpassed it's population limit?
2006-06-26 04:13:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we still had alcohol, corny come-on lines, and
emotionally needy men... there would still be babies
being born. Oh, I forgot, false promises for the future
are also included.
2006-06-26 04:00:52 · answer #5 · answered by leetledivineone 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but only one kid per couple.
Then, his reproductive ability would shrivel at the mere thought of what the outcome might be nine months later.
LOL!
2006-06-26 09:31:40 · answer #6 · answered by spedusource 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hhahahhahaha. lol. wooooo hooooooo
Don't start this. This may be a new form of Birth Control.
hahahahahah
Have a good night.
2006-06-26 04:00:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course wed still have babies
no, it isnt easier to get a man to go to church,
my grandpa,...???
2006-06-26 04:06:47 · answer #8 · answered by 0110010100 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
post this in the pregnancy section. doesent belong here.
2006-06-26 03:59:41 · answer #9 · answered by johnny_zondo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋