The user b.a.r.b.a.r.a posts contact information and can be contacted directly; that is an option Sealrborder could take.
2006-06-25 10:22:54 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
The immigration category?
2006-06-25 10:27:59 · update #1
DAR, I am finding out if it's ok to break the rules and guideliness of Yahoo. Of course this is not an immigration question; neither is the one yesterday.
2006-06-25 10:32:19 · update #2
Knights, no agenda; just getting feedback on the use of this forum category; this one seems to be a free for all. Just an observation....
2006-06-25 10:38:19 · update #3
Sqwirlsgirl, after analysing both posts, I came to the same insidious conclusion; that is the reason for my question.
2006-06-25 10:44:10 · update #4
Hadenough, your point is well taken; I looked at both sides because Seal was speaking to the 1st Amendment against the students; I have nothing against Seal, nor you; I am inquiring on the use of the category guideliness; what is good for the goose is good for the gander; the students were responders not askers; they appeared to dish back. Do you consider my question out of line?
2006-06-25 10:54:48 · update #5
AnnE, you seem to have a different kind of furrball reasoning....I have not seen one moral post on this panel by anyone, including me regarding the immigration issue. Aren't you the inhumane one that posted having bulls chase illegal immigrants as a solution? If you want to accuse them of having their pants down; what do you call your bull feat! Pants Up Moral? My take is they are calling out the double standard; I made contact. with them. They want people thinking for themselves and that translated here into illegals, foreigners, dumbasses, shove it up their you know whatasses, etc. So, are you telling me the students at b.a.r.b.a.r.a. cannot have their own furrball unless they agree with yours? Should they be threatened and slammed because they disagree with your morals? I noticed your best answers go to the people that agree with you. Morality is contrary to Legalism.The kids were addressing moral hypocrites. See? Personally, we need more sophistication.
2006-06-25 16:22:09 · update #6
I too have seen it both ways. If they can dish it-seal has every right to give it back. And she is not alone-many have commented on both.
And yes Yahoo allows it unless foul or inciting to an actual crime or perverted toward children.
And yes why didn't you point both out?
Not at all. I thought I did answer you as best as I could on Yahoo question, And your question does belong on immigration, here is where the posts are. Keep doing what your doing I have no problems with you neither. And you go back to your posts I like that a lot.
2006-06-25 10:41:59 · answer #1 · answered by *** The Earth has Hadenough*** 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
One of my first answers was to the moral post. And they assumed something that wasn't there. And yes they got caught with their pants down and I told them that. Afterwords they added my name to their posts. They were to arrogant to admit fault. And they were wrong!!Some of the others did admit it or carried on to other things. They couldn't take it but they could dish it out. I have no sympathy for them. They should be brought down a peg or two. Their brain hasn't caught up with their big head.
Sorry for taking your platform . It isn't against Yahoo's rules.
But sometimes it is kind of funny isn't it? Sometimes I get mad too and shouldn't say things. But not in their case-here I go again. Take care good question.
No I am telling you what happen. And why the remarks that go both ways. I am guilty at least I admit it. Some never do. And yes I will pick those answers I like who doesn't?
2006-06-25 18:40:32 · answer #2 · answered by Ann E 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isn't this whole immigration category "12 personal agendas".
12 people more or less who decide who can post and who can answer. 12 people who will tell you that you are UnAmerican and an idiot if you don't follow the herd. 12 people who say it is about illegals and use Mexico in every post.
So I would venture to guess if YAHOO doesn't allow personal agendas.......this specific category is doing so.
*giggle* furball.....that wasn't nice.
2006-06-25 17:36:02 · answer #3 · answered by sqwirlsgirl 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From what I have seen it goes both ways. What is your agenda that you point to only one? I have been reading for some time and know what has been written by both. And the others on the whole have been very vicious.
No problem than between us.
2006-06-25 17:30:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
And what exactly are you doing, then? This is not an immigration question.
Happens I have nothing against B.A.R.B.A.R.A, but on the other hand, I have nothing against Sealborders, either.
That's fine. I have nothing against you, either...
I'm not so worried about strict adherence to the guidelines as long as people aren't being nasty.
2006-06-25 17:27:29 · answer #5 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
SealRBorders is a misguided hateful person that tries to hide her racism behind denial. I hope one day she will change.
2006-06-25 17:30:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it goes both ways but i know what you mean i get this all the time you know who you are lol
2006-06-25 17:57:10 · answer #7 · answered by hayleylov 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋