I would spend three days in Florence and four in Rome. One of the major reasons is that you'll spend more time in queues in Rome!
Florence:
- Duomo
- Ponte Vecchio (old bridge)
- Uffizi Gallery (reservation required see www.firenzemusei.it - inside you'll find Botticelli's Birth of Venus, da Vinci's The Adoration of the Magi, etc)
- Santa Croce (basilica)
- Galleria dell'Academia (reservations required see www.firenzemusei.it - inside is Michaelangelo's David)
- Optional day-trip to Pisa to see The Leaning Tower
Rome
- Roman Forum
- Colliseum
- Vatican and St. Peters (with the Sistine Chapel)
- Spanish Steps
- Trevi Fountain
- Pantheon
- Trastevere (on Sunday morning, clothes market)
- Catacombs
The link below is to my favorite travel site, there is TONS of first-hand info about Italy, including suggested hotels, restaurants and attractions, and lots of photos.
2006-06-25 11:19:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jetgirly 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I just got back from Italy. I spent four days in Rome and three in Florence. If I had to do it again I would reverse the time. As a few of my fellow travelers have said Rome is much bigger and more difficult to get around but that is the reason to only spend three days. You can not possible "see" everything Rome has to offer in three OR four days. St. Peters and the Vactican Museums are a solid day and the coliseum and the forum are another day. If you want to shop or have a little down time there is another good part of a day. I would just plan on returning some day and work on things you missed this time. I made the mistake of trying to do too much and was just worn out by the end of the stay.
I really like Florence. It is smaller and easy to get around on foot. There is so much to see in the city if you really want to spend time seeing some of the greatest art in the world. With four days you can make a serious dent in the collection and still enjoy some shopping. I would also suggest a half-day trip to Piza. It takes an hour to get there and the trains run about every thirty minutes. If I remember right it was about 10 Euros RT. Reserve your climb to the top of the bell tower in advance. Also the walk to the tower from the train station is a pretty good distance. The bus (#1 if I remember right) drops you off on the back side of the site.
I really think Rome has to be done in stages. Florence is do-able in 4 days.
PS I would also suggest a taxi ride (15 euros) to Michaelangelo Piazza on a hill across the Arno. It is a beautiful view of Florence and if you get lucky and have some nice clouds, a breath-taking sunset.
2006-06-30 11:41:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by John S 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
It really all depends on what your interests are, what you really want to experience. For some people 1 day is too long, for others a lifetime is too short.
If you are looking for the traditional picture postcard, guided tour, I have been to Italy kind of trip, then the answers above are fine. If your goal is to also know modern Italy and the Italians then the priorities will change a little. Rome will have the shopping and good restaurants, but you may want to spend time in the less traveled parts of Rome, to eat at the local trattorias to get a feel for typical Italian food and to mix with real Italians.
The same is true for Florence, but there is also the countryside with fabulous scenery, vineyards and wineries not far outside of town. The Arno is a beautiful river. When I was there I watched crews practicing with their racing shells on the Arno, not far from the Ponte Vecchio.
Basically what I am saying is that there is so much more to do than trying to cram in all of the tourist sites of two cities in seven days. Nothing wrong with that, but slowing down, spending the time to see how people are living now as well as seeing the historical sites is more interesting to me, a better experience.
Part of your planning is researching to see if there are any local festivals going on during your planned visit. Only you can decide what your real interests are.
However you plan your trip, have fun and enjoy.
2006-06-26 18:38:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Raymond C 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Both places have become rather touristy, but both are so beautiful. If you wanted to adventure Rome, it will be very hard to get away from the crowds there. But the history and what's left of it in Rome is amazing, and if the crowds don't bother you and you just want to learn, I don't think staying in Rome longer than in Florence should be a problem. Rome is usually the first place people go, anyway, for their Italy experience.
As for Florence, it's much more laid back than Rome (and less expensive, mind you!). It's also much more beautiful (in my opinion) and you'll most definately be amazed by the shops they have. The people are friendly, too. If you want to just have a good time, buy some cool stuff, eat good food, and so on...go to Florence for much longer! Either place you go, there is always an interesting history in every part of Italy.
My suggestion: Florence - 4 days Rome- 3 days
2006-06-26 01:53:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Stratovarious 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
2 Days In Florence
2016-12-14 17:33:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by mcnear 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
3 Days In Florence
2016-11-11 05:04:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by ocasio 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rome is by large the... largest of those cities, then Milan (which have 30% less population than Rome but much smaller urban area); Florence is relatively smaller: if you like to walk, you can cross the city north to south and east to west in a day; Venice is really small, compared. In all of those places though there are too much to see, including Milan, too often considered just an industrial city or at the best the capital of fashion, forgetting Milan was yet there and was very important during Roman times and had a major role in Renaissance. So if you want "to see" the cities, your idea is good; though you may also consider about three days in Rome and one in Florence.
2016-03-14 15:10:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Rome is fabulous. I have been twice 4 days and five days. I will go back to Rome again as there is still much more to see. You only need 2 days in Florence to see the major stuff. Yes, Rome can be intimidating, but there is so much to see. Florence is a lot smaller but that means that all the tourists are concentrated into a smaller area.
First time in Rome you should see the Forum, Spanish Steps, Colloseum, Vatican, Catacombs, Appian Way, Trevi Fountain, Pantheon, Trastevere (neighbor acroos the river), Capitoline Hill and Museum, Palantine Hill (very green and peaceful, right in the middle of the city). Walk around enjoy the food and cafes. It is a compact city an you can walk almost anywhere. Yes, it's kinda dirty it's over 2,000 years old. So what.
The pickpocket thing in Rome is exaggerated. I only had trouble once from the little gypsy girls -- they try to poke you with a piece of cardboard or a newspaper while their friend tries to grab your purse or wallet. They are usually around the Trevi Fountain. Just beware and learn to yell vattene! (vat-tenay) (go away!) if you see them approach you.
2006-06-25 11:15:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well I arrived in Florence to spend about 10 days.That was 12 years ago and still have not seen it all.Florence is much much smaller than Rome and you can see a great variety in a short amount of time and less distances to walk.Give Florence at 5 days to just wander around,the rest of your trip spend in Rome with a specific visit plan.Have a great time.
2006-07-01 03:47:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by ken s 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
This Site Might Help You.
RE:
how many days should I stay in florence? How many in Rome?
I'm planning on visiting both florence and rome in 7 days but I dont know how to devide the days between the two. How many days should i spend in florence? And what are some of the places that I should visit? Thanks.
2015-08-13 15:58:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Florence is a good city to invest your holyday; see more with hotelbye . Florence's museums, palaces, and churches house some of the greatest artistic gifts in the world. Typically the most popular and essential memorial in Florence are: the Cathedral, the Baptistery, the Uffizi, the Bargello and the Accademia. Churches like: Santa Maria Novella and Santa Croce are veritable art galleries. In Florence you may also begin to see the great and various art collection stored in the Pitti Palace. The Palazzo Pitti (The Pitti Palace) is really a big 15th century palace situated on the quieter south bank of the Arno River. The palace was long time the house of Florence's rulers until 1919, when it absolutely was passed to the Italian state, which changed the palace right into a memorial complex. Notwithstanding their metamorphosis, from noble residence to a state-owned public creating, the palace however keeps the air and environment of a private collection in a grand house.
2016-12-20 21:32:55
·
answer #11
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋