If it's valid then answer me .
2006-06-25 06:53:17 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Simple
2006-06-25 06:57:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It amazes me that so many of you want to make this a courtroom where Christianity is on trial. Why are you working so hard at it? It really means absolutely nothing in the scheme of things... The OT is valid as a record of God's revelation of Himself to mankind in history. Duh...are you valid or not? Hopefully you are...please don't flaunt your stupidity...it really doesn't help your case...
2006-06-25 14:02:22 · answer #2 · answered by novalee 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it has to be "valid" to validate Jesus as the messiah. The mythology is real -- it's only the laws that don't pertain anymore.
Everything in the Bible is true -- and some of it actually happened!
2006-06-25 14:01:21 · answer #3 · answered by Hatikvah 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OT is redemption history.
Without OT you can't understand why Jesus had to die.
So OT is true and valid.
2006-06-25 14:40:43 · answer #4 · answered by hippoterry2005 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wish Christians would drop the OT, it would make my life easyer
then again they undermine what little they have of a religion if they do so...
2006-06-25 14:03:36 · answer #5 · answered by Gamla Joe 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes..a valid novel sort of a mind cook book.
2006-06-25 14:02:37 · answer #6 · answered by twostories 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is valid.
matthew 5: 17-19 say the law (and the prophets)are in effect till heaven and earth disapear.
jesus was referred to as the son of god.
his followers were referred to as children of god.
both these referred to a relationship with god.
jesus wasn't claiming to be god anymore than you or i am god.
the essenes referred to themselves as the children of light.
god is light. in him is no darkness at all(from a letter of john).
2006-06-25 15:51:20 · answer #7 · answered by Stuie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-06-25 13:57:12 · answer #8 · answered by bmxcollections 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No OT no NT.
Simple!
2006-06-25 13:59:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
valid,
2006-06-25 14:29:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋