Yes, but it's a little clunky. Maybe "Am I the only one who wants to eat there." It's more conversational. It should be understood that you're referring to the group you're with and not everyone on the planet.
2006-06-24 20:29:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by gypsynuke 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Am I the only one among us who wants to eat at that restaurant?
2006-06-24 20:28:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by druid 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you want to be really pedantic you could replace 'one' with 'person' ; 'that' is not the best word when referring to a person, should be 'who' and it also causes some repitition in the sentence ( two 'that s' close together, which sounds rather awkward). Result; Am I the only person who wants to eat at that restaurant.
2006-06-24 20:54:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Palamino 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Am I the only among us who wishes to dine in that restaurant?
2006-06-24 20:33:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by phyneassmamma 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Correct!
2006-06-24 20:28:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ryan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Almost! :)
"among us" is unnecessary but the meaning is still clear. It is okay for "among us" to be there but it is not essential.
Am I the only one WHO wants to eat at that restuarant?
2006-06-24 22:26:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by queenbee 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes it is a correct sentence but for the punctuation marks missing here and there.
2006-06-24 20:34:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Am I the only want who doesn't want to die at this resturant? I ask because my God, their food is going to kill us all. The Chef is an Alien!!"
If you want to broaden the sentence a bit. lol.
2006-06-24 23:16:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Adam Taha 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-06-24 20:54:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by leon_godless 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yep
2006-06-24 20:33:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by david 2
·
0⤊
0⤋