English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If this is true, then it's another point to write congress about:

The North American Union is envisioned to create a super-regional political authority that could override the sovereignty of the United States on immigration policy and trade issues. In his June 2005 testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Robert Pastor, the Director of the Center for North American Studies at American University, stated clearly the view that the North American Union would need a super-regional governance board to make sure the United States does not dominate the proposed North American Union once it is formed:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/230506_b_Amero.htm

2006-06-24 16:28:03 · 6 answers · asked by yars232c 6 in Politics & Government Immigration

supposed, you can save it.

2006-06-24 16:28:21 · update #1

I'm on your side Flun. I first heard of this, and other people have asked about it, when a congressman demanded to Bush that he has no authority to be the decider and do this outside of Congress. Because the Senate is for allowing millions in, and don't give credible reasons, you should at least be aware of some reasons perhaps why so if your against this, you have the power of your vote, and vice versa.

2006-06-24 16:36:01 · update #2

Political Propaganda? Since when is telling the truth that? I would think suppressing it like your implying is.

2006-06-25 14:53:31 · update #3

6 answers

Sucker, there hasn't been any sovereignty in any country since the corporations went multi-national. This is the last gasp of corrupt forms of government trying to take what they think is theirs before they lose out completely, assuming this fairy tale is even real. You might as well forget complaining because the days of the single nation citizen are gone if not numbered!

2006-06-24 16:35:29 · answer #1 · answered by weirdarchives@prodigy.net 3 · 0 0

There's not going to be any North American Union, this isn't Europe, there might be some out-of-work and possibly tarred-and-feathered politicians, but there's only 50 states, and those that don't care for that arrangement are free to find other places of residence. Witness Gov. Schwarzenegger. Wealthy movie star/corporation owner-turned-politician, now governor of the state of California. Is arnie one of the Forces Of Evil? No, but he is a sign of the changing times, where money speaks loudest,
we do live in a changing world. But: Does that type of change include yielding american sovereignty over the 50 states and territories? Not unless an overwhelming portion of american voters get stoned instead of heading to the polls, or decide it's just too much trouble to participate in the american political process...get out and VOTE. It's your right, don't waste the opportunity to remind Congress that their position is transitory in nature, and most states have provision for recall elections, and it could be applied to THEM in a hot second if they start voting the country down the river...protect, preserve, and uphold the Constitution, and our 50 states and the Citizens therein, that should be the first job of government. The welfare thing? That's overdue for cancellation...the border? That should be a no-brainer, and should have been handled 10 years ago. It's coming to a head NOW because the voters are finally bringing the issue to their state capitols. Americans want the Mexicans OUT. It's not a race thing, it's a not-paying-taxes-to-support another-country thing...

2006-06-25 04:31:39 · answer #2 · answered by gokart121 6 · 0 0

You are using the Yahoo Answer for political propaganda and forming of public opinion in favour of Democrats keeping the coming election in the US in view. You are a party agent!

2006-06-24 16:47:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I also went through a period when I was gullible to all the conspiracy theorists.

Don't worry, eventually you'll get enough real-life experience to understand why things like that don't work.

2006-06-24 16:32:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i heard abt this thing on g. gordon liddy. maybe u could go to his webpage and find out more, but i think they were wanting to have it by 2010

2006-06-24 16:38:03 · answer #5 · answered by brngrl243 1 · 0 0

hell want happen

2006-06-24 16:32:07 · answer #6 · answered by idontkno 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers