English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I actually read the report and it seems to say the exact opposite of what certain people are claiming. It seems some people are either lying or there is another part I did'nt see, please explain. Any statements will be verified.

2006-06-24 10:40:19 · 5 answers · asked by JoeThatUKnow 3 in Politics & Government Military

5 answers

There was no WMD program -- it was all a hoax.

2006-06-24 10:45:40 · answer #1 · answered by Zabela 4 · 0 1

We still have the yellowcake, aluminum tubes and nuclear issue that the administration claimed was part of their WMD program.

Not in existence. Again, no confirmation of the existence of a nuclear WMD program like the Bush Administration claimed.

Condi Rice said we didn't want the smoking gun in the form of a mushroom cloud, in order to restate Adminstration claims that not just ANY WMD's, but specifically those that were nuclear-related justified an invasion.

I want to know why someone in the Administration outed one of our secret agents during war? WHY???

2006-06-24 11:00:02 · answer #2 · answered by NightShade 3 · 0 0

Iraq's arsenal of weapons of mass destruction was not captured by US forces who heroically brought down Saddam Hussein's regime three years ago this week. It vanished before they arrived.
Israeli intelligence reported before the US-led invasion that starting in late summer 2002 Saddam's WMD arsenal was shipped by truck convoy to Syria. Recently, documents seized from Iraq after the fall of the regime were released to the public. Those documents revealed that under the direct command of former Russian prime minister and KGB boss Yevgeny Primakov, Russian Spetnaz forces oversaw the transfer of Iraq's WMD to Syria ahead of the US-led invasion. These reports have been corroborated by Saddam's Air Vice Marshall General Georges Sada.

So rather than being destroyed or secured, Saddam's WMD arsenal was simply moved from one rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations to another rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations.

Of course, American Media will NOT report this, it will prove Bush right, and then they would look stupid.

Michael Moore, thanks:
Friday, 23 June 2006
When News Lies


WHEN NEWS LIES
Media Complicity and The Iraq War


By Danny Schechter, The News Dissector



A new book from Danny Schechter offers an up to date indictment of the role media played in promoting and misreporting the war on Iraq. It is an analysis of how and why the media got it wrong that pinpoints the failures of journalism and the collusion of media companies with the Bush Administration. The author of EMBEDDED: Weapons of Mass Deception (Prometheus 2003), an account of the TV coverage of the US invasion, returns with a more comprehensive, updated and insider look at the media complicity that Schechter argues "made the war possible."



"Most of the anti-war movement focused on the crimes of the Bush Administration ignoring the mainstream media, its far more effective accomplice," says former network producer Danny Schechter (ABC, CNN). "The government orchestrated the war while the media marketed it. You couldn't have one without the other."



WHEN NEWS LIES includes the feature -length DVD of the prize-winning film WMD (Weapons of Mass Deception). The book will also include the complete script as well as a discussion of the challenges of exposing media with media with a documentary. It chronicles the media war fought alongside the military campaign and the struggle to stand up for truth.

2006-06-24 10:45:45 · answer #3 · answered by Mark W 5 · 0 0

I wholeheartedly hope you will check out this report, entitled: Saddam's WMDs are in Syria: Michael Evans compiles multiple reports of weapons transfer (see link below)

Let us know if you discover anything new. I'm fascinated with this topic.

If Saddam had really destroyed all his WMDs, why didn't he show proof? He must have known we'd bomb his pretty new palaces.

Why were 17 UN resolutions issued against him? Do you really think that the intelligence services of every country, Russia, Germany, France, UK, USA was wrong?

2006-06-24 10:51:29 · answer #4 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0 0

pure and simple. What we found was absolute evidence that saddam had destroyed to the best of his ability all wmd. Yes, some wmd traces were found, but buried, burned, etc.

A lot of repugnicons are trying to make it sound like they found wmd prooving bushes lies to be true. Sorry, no. Just more noise
and spin like always...repugnicons lie lie lie and lie.

2006-06-24 10:44:47 · answer #5 · answered by kucitizenx 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers