It's obvious big business is not obeying the law. The illegals don't know how to read English. No hiring of illegals=No illegals. Let the churches and ministries do their jobs. They are more compasionate and fair to these people.
2006-06-24 03:06:24 · 17 answers · asked by elperro 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
DAR I'm talking about the church going over there to help. I guess nobody read the rest of the question.
2006-06-24 03:20:42 · update #1
LOL You people are idiots. No wonder we have all these problems. I guess illegals own business that's why they hire illegals.
2006-06-24 03:38:29 · update #2
I agree with what you're saying.
2006-06-24 03:09:47 · answer #1 · answered by glow 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
When I go to another country I make an effort to speak some of the language. When a person comes to visit here they make an effort to learn some of the language . that is common sense. But, when a person comes here illegally they don't make the effort to learn. They are here illegal so they should be treated like criminals.If I go to another country you don't think that they will change their laws so that I can read them. I should know the law before I go. We have schools that teach all kinds of languages. But first they should try to become a citizen. I believe that yo are catering to too many immigrants when my grandfather came here the requirement was for him to learn English..the people that have been here for yeas should know the language by now. This is America and ENGLISH is our language......
2006-06-24 10:23:18 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure. Since Puerto Rico is certainly administrated by America, it is necessary for laws to also be in Spanish. It's really no big deal. If you can't read Spanish, don't look at the Spanish section.
2006-06-24 11:54:22 · answer #3 · answered by kobacker59 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, anyone that is in america should learn to speak and read in english. anyone that doesn't know the language of the country they live in should learn the language of the country they live in. do you think non-english speaking countries would bend so far backwards as to change their way of doing things if all of a sudden there was an influx of english speakers there illegally? no they wouldn't. it would be "learn it our way or go back home".
2006-06-24 10:16:37 · answer #4 · answered by loving 40+ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL.
However, if the churches had their way they would bring in all of Latin America to build their parishes. The schools and social services being sufficient to serve those here is really not their concern. Building parishes, on the other hand, builds the power of the church.
Sorry, but we'd be overrun.
2006-06-24 10:10:28 · answer #5 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
English only! If illegal Mexicans are going to come over here and take so much away from us, the very least they could do is to learn our language.
2006-06-25 00:28:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, I think it should, they can have two constitutions, one for people that speak english and another in spanish. Maybe that will help some people not break the laws so much and we would have a more calm place to live
2006-06-24 10:14:56 · answer #7 · answered by stacey 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, the law should be in Spanish. In countries like Spain, Mexico..etc.
2006-06-24 10:12:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It makes sense. Since there're a lot of Spanish speakers in the U.S. who don't understand English, a copy of the law in Spanish would work well for them.
2006-06-24 12:30:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!!!! This is America and our language is English...
When I was in Europe I had to learn their language before I could work there, and I did.. Nothing was in English for me and I didn't expect it to be, after all I was in their country and I respected that.
2006-06-24 11:35:12 · answer #10 · answered by GTcasper 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Goodness, it's a good thing you didn't say that in public -
You should remember, once anything is translated to another language, it's meaning isn't quite the same, and we don't need anymore of those frivolous lawsuits.
2006-06-24 11:25:51 · answer #11 · answered by yars232c 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋