I don't know, because I'm totally confused by what you're trying to say!!
Most people get excited if they ARE able to travel soon!! But you're saying that IF you could travel to London - which you can't - you wouldn't be excited ...
What WOULD get you excited? What don't you like about London?
Surely you meant to say "If I could go to London tomorrow, I would be excited right now!"
(That would imply that you WANTED to go to London though...!!)
Your original sentence also implies that you ARE excited right now - but you wouldn't be excited if you were going to London tomorrow ....
WHY are you excited??!??!
2006-06-23 20:34:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by _ 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Alternative:
If I could go to London the next day, I wouldn't be excited right now.
2006-06-24 03:13:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Malcolm uses Xbox 360 Avatar 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Think of something else to say. It makes no sense at all. Are you saying in a round about way that you are glad you are not going to London tomorrow?
2006-06-24 07:25:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's perfectly correct and makes a lot of sense, Immomen. If you do get to London, look me up.
2006-06-24 03:22:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
2006-06-24 03:12:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by eDiNa 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it is perfectly grammatical, but I can't figure out the meaning or the context in which someone would want to say it.
2006-06-24 03:19:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is correct even though it doesn't make sense.
2006-06-24 03:14:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kenneth H 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it is not correct sentence.and how it is incorrect why i tell u
2006-06-24 03:15:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋