the winace supports .zip, .rar, and .ace and alot more so i guess it's the best of the list, also some ppl say it has the highest compression rate between them 3
2006-06-23 18:57:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by MiG 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
By your criteria it would be winrar because it supports all 3 file types. .zip .rar and .ace.
The following clipped fom the source listed below.
WinAce does an excellent job at compressing video files. Although the compression time is not long, the archives created with WinAce are half the size of the ones created with WinRAR and even thirty times smaller than the ones created using WinZip. Unfortunately, this is the only file format where WinAce excels. In the text, image and audio tests WinAce failed to impress, the compression time being very close to the one achieved by WinRAR, often longer, and the archive size always smaller than WinRAR's.
About WinRAR
This little archiver has a very practical user interface. You can easily reduce the size of the buttons which offer you the basic operations for an archive: extract, test, repair, find, etc.
The menus offer access to important archive commands (like extract, test, comment, protect, lock), but also other important tools such as scan, convert or benchmark and hardware test.
The options are not as numerous as in WinZip and WinAce, but like all other aspects of WinRAR, they are practical and cover the basic needs for properly configuring an archiver.
WinRAR supports the following file formats: rar, zip, cab, arj, lzh, ace, 7-zip, tar, gzip, uue, bz2, jar, iso, z and will compress files to .rar, .zip and to self-extracting .exe
Compression
With WinZip out of the picture from the beginning and WinAce winner only for video files, you can easily guess what the results were for WinRAR. It's quite amazing what this small app can do to your uncompressed files. During testing not only did it have a much faster compression speed than WinAce, but the file sizes were a lot smaller too. This makes WinRAR the winner in the battle for smaller files in the shortest time possible.
2006-06-23 18:54:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
always Winrar bcoz it support more compression file type anyone and also some uniqe also.
Good luck!!!!!
2006-06-23 18:54:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Net Oracle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
WinRAR ofcource....the output doesn't get corrupted and is compression is even higher.
2006-06-23 18:52:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by mathewparet 2
·
0⤊
0⤋