Like Wisconson and New Mexico going for Gore or Washington having areas were more votes went for Kerry than the # of registered voters, ect.
2006-06-23 10:43:53 · 10 answers · asked by miknave 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
Because the public is constantly victimized by the tree-hugging pot smoking self-riteous liberal media.
2006-06-23 10:47:40 · answer #1 · answered by answrwoman77 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Probably because they weren't enough to make a difference in the election. Otherwise, I'm sure the R's would have been there to dispute them.
Why would it be irregular for Wis and NM going Gore. It happened that way shees.
I specifically remember that when there were issues in FL, the Bush camp didn't waste ANY time getting Baker down there to deal with it.
If there are truely voting problems, they should be investigated regardless of party affected. Sheesh people, be objective.
danny K, you're a retard-- this questioner is clearly a republican. learn how to read you cretin
2006-06-23 17:51:48 · answer #2 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because in these two states the outcome was critical. I am sure there were irregularities in other states but these were states were the votes were extremely close. You know this division in this country is the saddest thing I've ever seen. Usually once the election is over the Congress attempts to stay party neutral and vote on merits. Not any more. I think the one thing I dislike most about Bush being President is that he is the one who created and encourages this division.
2006-06-23 17:56:16 · answer #3 · answered by olderandwiser 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the media has not bothered to keep reporting it like they do on problems in areas where Bush won. There were dead people voting in a lot of Democrat districts, and there were people registered that did not exist in South Dakota, but you won't hear about it from the mainstream media because Democrats were involved.
2006-06-23 17:48:34 · answer #4 · answered by Norm 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the Republican National Committee was responsible for the tampering. In ohio, a man was arrested for voter tampering. The RNC paid a million dollars for his defense. Phone records establish that the man called the White House several times on election day.
2006-06-23 17:48:16 · answer #5 · answered by Michael D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There were voting irregularities in many states. The media only covered the states that the Republican's won.
2006-06-23 17:46:19 · answer #6 · answered by FozzieBear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
more effort has been put into generating those proofs.
and yes, the elections were factually rigged in 2004 in almost every state.
The only exceptions might be Hawaii and New Mexico.
2006-06-24 17:50:44 · answer #7 · answered by kucitizenx 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as the end result put Bush in the White House, I really don't care.
2006-06-23 17:47:43 · answer #8 · answered by meathead76 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is over.
You lost.
Now you can look forward to losing again.
2006-06-23 17:47:43 · answer #9 · answered by DannyK 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kiss my *** I am not interested in you you mf.
2006-06-23 18:29:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋