UH OH we found chemical weapons in Iraq!!?

Question

So, for all you anti war mongers out there...Here is your reason for war.

See also this article: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060623/ap_on_go_co/iraq_s_weapons


Any comments?

Before anyone goes calling me moron read the ENTIRE article and realize that chemical weapons are illegal.
These weapons are still very dangerous and potentially deadly.

True, they are old, but having them is illegal and I have a sneaking suspicion these aren't the only ones that are in Iraq.

Answer 1

When your president took us to war 76% of the American public supported the war. Now only 33%. Lets put Sadam back in power, let him continue to kill his people and train terrorists so we can have another 9/11. Stick all your lame excuses in a box, the American soldiers are not going to cower in a corner or let our citizens and soldiers be slaughtered and beheaded. We will have our revenge!
"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
Winston Churchill

Answer 2

that is so lame if you read the report the weapons are nullified before the invasion in 2003 this is just a desperate attempt to get reelected. the u.s. uses way more lethal stuff. as for the alleged reason for war, i guess they don't want what happened in vietnam by pulling out of war, but the soldiers are already doing what they did in vietnam with killing civilians and children there's like three incidents already and probably more to come.

Answer 3

Oh Please ,.. you must be one of the many non-thinking morons that put him in office, Twice,. sure There were Degraded chemical weapons, NOTE THE WORD degraded, these things dated back before his Daddy and the rest of the word got his *** outta Kuwait, this is the stuff he used on the Kurds,that why they didn't even bother to tell us about them ,.and the fact that they were found 2 years ago,.. If this moron wasn't running for Office ,.and i foget his name at the moment they woundn't even be a issue,. which they are not ,... because unlike you ,. most people paid full attention to what was said about them ,.. wake up,. and think for yourself, try to explain why 2,500 American Kids are dead, why 30,000 are forever wounded , mentally and physiaclly, and counting ,... then come back ,and pick your face up out the mudd, come out in public saying something as stupid a this ,.. This is your justification for war huh, Moron

Answer 4

Uh oh, even the Bush Administration admits that they're not the ones mentioned in the 2002 NIE. Therefore, not the reason.

Got yellowcake?

Answer 5

Hey, Robert, do you want to open one in your house with your family there? I really rather doubt it. If you had read the article it said may not be able to be used the way they were intended that doesn't mean that they still aren't dangerous.

Answer 6

Produced BEFORE the First Gulf War?!!

you should be asking yourself WHO
(ahem-GeorgeBushSrofCIAandRonaldReagan-ahem)
sold them those particular chemical weapons in the fiorst place!

; )

Answer 7

I bet not one liberal who says these chemicals are expired would go within 50 feet of one of these barrels.

Answer 8

UH-OH!! They are old and out of date and as deadly as Windex!!!!

Good thing we invaded!!!

Answer 9

I always thought that the reason was oil..... And I think that your link helps prove that.

Answer 10

NEVER HAPPENED,, THIS IS A WAG THE DOG WAR AND EVERYBODY KNOWS IT,,, FROM A RETIRED MARINE