Should President Fox be hunted down like Saddam?

Question

I keep hearing the illegals saying that they come to this country because of the horrible things their president does, and allows to be done to them. Illegals say they are too afraid to stand up to the problem, and that is why they have come here. If Americans should have to fix thier problems, then we should be allowed to hunt down, and put this president on trial for the abusive manner in which he treats his people. They tell me that revolutions in this country has always been met with mass murder, so why are we not chasing down President Fox for these crimes against his people, like we did with Iraq. It would be easier to hunt him down, we already know where he is. I have heard all of the reasons as to why we went to Iraq, but I want to know why the same rules don't apply to Mexico's leader.

Answer 1

It's not only his fault. Actually, he hasn't been that bad of a president. He was good intentioned since the beggining of his term. But, he could have a million of good proposals, but if congress doesn't agree, then there's nothing he can do. It's not only about the president, it's about all the the people in congress. If anything, haunt them down too.

If you know anything about Mexican politics, then you know that the PRI party was in power for 70 yrs. until we, the people, decided to change that and voted for Fox for our president with the PAN party. Mexico had never experienced that, it was a good change. We freed ourselves from the opretion of the PRI. Fox could not change all the wrong the PRI did for 70 yrs., but he started.

At least now, the people know that we can actually vote and elect the person we want to "rule" our country. As I said before, it's not only the president's work, congress has a lot to do with it.

Anyway, Fox has only 1 week and 2 days left of his presidency. July 2nd will make history in our country, since now, the PRD leftist party is really strong, with AMLO as their candidate. It looks like he's going to win, let's see what he does.

Answer 2

It's not that he treats the people wrong it's that all the money that the government takes from it's people is not put back into the community. Coming to the US is a lot easier for the people to do than to put up with the hypocrisy that the government does. It's not like Saddam President Fox doesn't have people killed and innocent murdered just so he can prove his point, he has no point. That's the problem.The country doesn't do anything about it because most of all the lawyers and high ranking people in the country can be bought. Mexico is a country that if you have money you can get away with everything, and hunting him down would do no good.

Answer 3

The corruption in that country is down right rampant, from the cops on the street to fox, the cops and army (Mexico's) are all bought off by the drug cartels down there..... we shouldn't even recognize fox as the president, just some crime boss.
Who thinks that the people that were video taped crossing our border (in Mexico's army uniform) were actually real army helping to transport drugs?? And fox swearing up and down that it wasn't...what a liar!! Why didn't our government demand answers to that episode?? Like it was swept under the rug......

Answer 4

Some illegal aliens are from Mexico, not all, and unless Fox is actively gunning his citizens down in the streets, or running them over with tanks, pulling out their fingernails and eyeballs, they've got nothing to gripe about. What the Mexican People need to do is march in their OWN streets, demand benefits from their OWN government, and fix their OWN problems. When they're done, they will OWN their VERY OWN country, and we can have ours back. Great deal, eh? LOL As for the rest of the people that've snuck in, some of them are from Really Shitty Places that do the things I've mentioned above. What do you say about them?
Line em up and 30 seconds with a tommy gun? That's a Hitler approach, there...send em back? Their government might do the same thing. Some of them LIKED Hitler, thought he was an OK guy. We kind of try to ride the Big White Horse, though, be all Roy Rogers, save people from themselves, damsels in distress(ok, now I admit, 'damsel' sure sounds french, but if a cowboy used it, it must be OK by now, right?) So, you've got not 'illegal immigrants' but 'refugees', people that might DIE if they get sent home. You're killing em by delay by putting em on that plane. Now, question is, where does our moral responsibility for something like that start, or end? Decisions, decisions...
expand the ol' welfare state to accomodate all comers at an unknown future cost, including riots etc on our shores, ultimately, or be cold about it and send em home to uncertain fates? After all, it's not GUARANTEED they'll eat a bullet as soon as they get home, just assumed...

I think the Right Answer with Mexico is a good border, and if the people of Mexico don't see fit to honor that border, then our side of it needs to be immediately and drastically improved to the point where their co-operation isn't a factor anymore. Good fences DO make good neighbors, liberal bleeding hearts aside.
At the end of the day, do you want 15 people living in your house?
Over your dead body, you say? What if it comes to that? Home invasion robberies ARE in the news...my vote's for improving that border....and giving the ICE and the Border Patrol enough money and moral support so they feel 'right' in doing their job, and can get it done rapidly, efficiently, and effectively. THEN we can talk about whatever 'help' Mexico might actually NEED...I guarantee it'll be a fraction of the cost of feeding and housing their people now....face facts, this administration, or the next, and the next one after that also have a responsibility to the american people called 'being good stewards of the federal budget'. You can't do that when the population count is expanding by 1,200 illegal immigrants per day from Mexico(estimated). You can't build jail cells fast enough, or hospitals or schools fast enough, or create jobs fast enough to keep up with that kind of 'growth'. I don't want to see american citizens supplanted on our own soil, yet that's exactly the kind of failure that we're being set up for, taken over by corporations and foreign countries...

Answer 5

that is more effective with the objective to do with the actual undeniable actuality that the rustic operates in a conservative way - the republican way, so Obama of direction receives the backhands for an same imagine Bush receives the brown nosing for. No American can take credit for the taking down of Saddam, because it became usa that positioned him there contained in the first position and created the completed difficulty through attempting to administration yet another usa.

Answer 6

The actions of the Mexican army for years IS AN ACT OF WAR by shooting .50 caliber bullets at our boys all the time WITH NO RECOGNITION FROM OUR LEADERS.

You cannot assasinate any high ranking diplomats anywhere, we've had enough of our own.

But I think you and Pat Roberson could be good buddies! He uses the airwaves of the 700 club to force our government to assasinate the President of Venezuela!

Answer 7

If you were to kill vicente Fox (whos leaving in a month anyway) the corruption will still be there. USA must take steps to end this corruption. Mexico has gold, oil, riches, great tourist attraction, etc.. there is no reason for them to be a third world. Their corruptuon must be cleaned up.

Answer 8

Vicente Fox is under the protection of George W Bush,and anyone messing with him will have his taxes audited for past years and will be checked regularly in future years for any inconsistencies

Answer 9

Vicente Fox needs to be prosecuted for crimes against humanity.

Answer 10

No. He and Bush are buddy buddy. Fox didnt cause the corruption anyway, he just got into office. His party was the first party to come into presidency in decades and they cannot change everything in one term!