English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We have recently completed a scientific study actually proving that God exists. It is no longer a matter of faith but a matter of fact. We are about to publish this paper, would you be interested in a copy? We will need reaction! If you are interested please write and we will make sure you receive a copy shortly.

2006-06-23 05:25:00 · 37 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

37 answers

I would like to see what proof and science you have to verify this. I always thought it was faith that confirmed its existence.

2006-06-23 05:31:34 · answer #1 · answered by Cantrelle 3 · 2 2

Yes, rather than suggesting that God was unknowable, Paul was emphasizing that those who made the Athenian altar, as well as many in his audience, did not yet know Him. Paul then urged them—and all who have since read his speech—to seek to know the Creator, for “he is not far off from each one of us.” (Acts 17:27) You can see that Paul tactfully introduced the fact that we can see evidence of a Creator of all things by observing his creation. By doing this, we can also discern some of his qualities.

For instance, Albert Einstein was convinced that the universe had a beginning, and he expressed his desire “to know how God created the world.”

Psalms 19:1: “The heavens are declaring the glory of God; and of the work of his hands the expanse is telling.”

Psalms 104:24: “How many your works are, O Jehovah! All of them in wisdom you have made. The earth is full of your productions.”

Romans 1:20: “His invisible qualities are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made.”

'New Scientist' magazine said: “The lay view persists—of scientists having ‘disproved’ religion. It is a view that commonly expects scientists to be nonbelievers; that Darwin put the last nails in God’s coffin; and that a succession of scientific and technological innovations since have ruled out the possibility of any resurrection. It is a view that is wildly wrong.”—May 26, 1977, p. 478.

A member of the French Academy of Sciences stated: “Natural order was not invented by the human mind or set up by certain perceptive powers. . . . The existence of order presupposes the existence of organizing intelligence. Such intelligence can be none other than God’s.”—Dieu existe? Oui (Paris, 1979), Christian Chabanis, quoting Pierre-Paul Grassé, p. 94.

Scientists have identified over 100 chemical elements. Their atomic structure displays an intricate mathematical interrelationship of the elements. The periodic table points to obvious design. Such amazing design could not possibly be accidental, a product of chance.

Illustration: When we see a camera, a radio, or a computer, we readily acknowledge that it must have been produced by an intelligent designer. Would it be reasonable, then, to say that far more complex things—the eye, the ear, and the human brain—did not originate with an intelligent Designer?

If you would like further information or you would like to receive the book 'Is There a Creator Who Cares About You?', please contact Jehovah's Witnesses at the local Kingdom Hall. Or visit http://www.watchtower.org

2006-06-23 05:52:55 · answer #2 · answered by Jeremy Callahan 4 · 0 0

No, there is no scientific proof of God's existence because science by definition, deals only with natural phenomena. Religions, cults and sects deal with the supernatural.

Of course, Magnets were once thought to be supernatural. That is another thing that separates science and religion, science will change as new evidence is discovered. Religion is stuck in the time frame it was devised by man.

By what definition is your study using for God? Anyone can redefine a rock to be a god and thus prove god's existence.

2006-06-23 05:34:12 · answer #3 · answered by happyharrytick 3 · 0 0

Perhaps if we look not to the Bible, or any other holy texts, and just around us, at the great big fat Cosmos in which we exist, we can - maybe - all agree that there is a Higher Power at work here, keeping matter solid, energy intangible, gravity and magnetism and polarity working. The keenest scientific minds can only really observe and comment on how things are, no-one seems to have a hot-line to the authority behind the rules of our game.
Or am I wrong?

2006-06-23 05:34:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If they ever get scientific proof of the existence of a god, any god, I'll stop being an atheist. I'm not holding my breath, though.
And don't you believers get tired of having nothing better to fall back on but your lame proclamations of "faith"? I can tell you I have absolutely no faith in your allegedly "scientific" study that proves god exists.

2006-06-23 05:31:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Apologists were claiming to have evidence of god's existence for hundreds of years even if it continuously seems to be a pile of logical fallacies or self-serving interpretations of records. i'm making of venture your "evidence" is a few thing alongside the lines of the accepted "that is too not common for me to understand, therefore a magic guy contained in the sky must have executed it." Or is it yet another one in each of those "proofs" that relies upon on the mathematical illiteracy of the target audience?

2016-11-15 04:14:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i am 100% positive there is no scientific proof of the existance of the bible god.
if your paper talks about the opposite, it is wrong.
it is not a matter of stubborness, it is a matter of fact.
there can't be no scientific proof of something invented in the mind of some control freaks 2000 years ago and put in a silly book.
got it?

2006-06-23 05:31:34 · answer #7 · answered by peaceful light 5 · 0 0

No.

God cannot be proven to exist, or not exist, by means of scientific method.

Also, the proof or experiment must be replicable by anybody, anywhere in the word, with the same or similar equipment.

2006-06-23 05:30:18 · answer #8 · answered by Kreb D 2 · 0 0

Yes of cause their is. Your body is bioligic isn't it. So therefore scientific, therefore that proves God. Science cannot create man. science does not disprove God. Science proves he's real. Love a copy

2006-06-23 05:30:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sounds great. I'll take a copy.

AFSS Corp
12555 Biscayne Blvd, PMB 720
North Miami, FL 33181

wily@wilyelder.com

2006-06-23 05:28:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't know how you managed to scientifically prove God's existence--because as far as I know, no one can--it's all a matter of faith. (The existence of Jesus, however, has been historically proved).

2006-06-23 05:35:30 · answer #11 · answered by Holiday Magic 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers