English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't remember it from school. That omission and the fact that his disciples were all men.. does that imply he was "happier in the company of other men?", permenantly? Okay the bible wrote that he had a few token *** hags.. I mean associates who happened to be women. Lke the prostitute that was about to be stoned or something... Your thoughts?

2006-06-22 19:33:10 · 36 answers · asked by How Much? How Much???? 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

36 answers

The prostitute you are talking about may be Mary Magdalene.Well,Mary Magdalene is no such thing.That unfortunate misconception is the legacy of a smear campaign launched by the early church.The church need to defame her in order to cover up her dangerous secret and that is she may be the pregnant wife of Jesus Christ.It kinda of makes sense because Christ is a Jew and the social decorum during that time virtually forbid a Jewish man to be unmarried.According to Jewish custom,celibacy was condemned,and the obligation of a Jewish father was to find a suitable wife for his son.If Christ was not married,atleastone gospels would have mentioned it and offered some explanation for his unnatural state of bachelorhood.I don't believed there would be any evidence in the bible because from what i heard,the pagan roman emperor,Constantine the great who everybody thought was a Christian collated the bible,as we know it today,the New Testament.The earlier gospels which may contained the evidence of Christ having a wife was gathered up,outlaw and burn.Probably the reason,they want to cover the relationship fact between Christ and Mary Magdalene was probably because Christ afterall was not born divine.He was born mortal and since even after 4 centuries after his death,people are still worshipping him,Constantine the great does not want people to think that its pornography.So he financed a new bible,which ommited Christ human traits and embellished those gospels that make him godlike.So the bible we are in possess now are all Constantine the great's version.After all,the bible are documents recorded by the early people.It doesnt fall from the sky.

2006-06-22 20:14:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

John 17:3,5,24; Jesus was with God before the world was.
Job.38:4-7; The angels saw the eaarth become the focus for habitation, 41, 870 years before Adam.

When Adam had daughters, some of the angels materialized and took wemon and they did have giants by them, that could not reproduce and they became extince when the flood did away with persons of violence.

Jesus never had and never will have such interest and the holy angels are the same.

It was only the unholy angels. Jude 6; 2 Pet.2:4;

2006-06-22 19:42:17 · answer #2 · answered by jeni 7 · 0 0

This is in regards with the Da Vinci Code.

Hollywood intends to re-write history but one only needs to research for themselves the validity of the claims. For example the quality of the New Testament documents can be validated outside of the Bible through the research of Josephus Flavius, Tacitus, Caesar's Gallic Wars, Herodotus, and Thucydides. In fact there are 5366 documents discovered so far to validate that the Bible we have today is 99.5% as accurate as it was way back then. For example:

The first-century Jewish historian Josephus referred to the stoning of “James, the brother of Jesus who was called the Christ.” (The Jewish Antiquities, Josephus, Book XX, sec. 200) A direct and very favorable reference to Jesus, found in Book XVIII, sections 63, 64, has been challenged by some who claim that it must have been either added later or embellished by Christians; but it is acknowledged that the vocabulary and the style are basically those of Josephus, and the passage is found in all available manuscripts.

Tacitus, a Roman historian who lived during the latter part of the first century C.E., wrote: “Christus [Latin for “Christ”], from whom the name [Christian] had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus.”—The Complete Works of Tacitus (New York, 1942), “The Annals,” Book 15, par. 44.

With reference to early non-Christian historical references to Jesus, The New Encyclopædia Britannica states: “These independent accounts prove that in ancient times even the opponents of Christianity never doubted the historicity of Jesus, which was disputed for the first time and on inadequate grounds by several authors at the end of the 18th, during the 19th, and at the beginning of the 20th centuries.”—(1976), Macropædia, Vol. 10, p. 145.

Internal evidence is pretty clear as well. 2 Peter 3:15-16 clearly states that the canon was already in the process of being collected for what we have today in the Bible. There were gnostic books but they were not accepted because they were written by Hellenistic writers that intended to change the original message of the Greek translation to imply that Jesus was not the Son of God.

See the sources below for addition research.

Source(s):

"Exploring the Da Vinci Code"
"Breaking the Da Vinci Code"
"Is the New Testament Documents Reliable?"
"The Gospel Code"
"Hidden Gospels - How the Search for Jesus Lost the Way"

Last this is a personal favorite of mine...

"New Evidence that Demands a Verdict"

go to any book store and pick them up.

2006-06-22 19:40:42 · answer #3 · answered by ddead_alive 4 · 0 0

Whatever you and all believers believe is beliefs. If there are believers, those religious stupids will say anything.

Jesus is a person, similar to us (you, me, and all). He was born some x years ago. He travelled to many places to know the truth. Finally, he got what he wants - in India. He went to his native place and started preaching whatever he gained.

No one in this universe can do "miracles". So, Jesus have not done any miracles. But, those stupid disciples of Jesus, spread through words that Jesus did miracles. Now, it is around 2000 years. People still spreading those stupid words. And, they are not going to stop anytime.

If you are smart enough, come out of this stupidity and enjoy the real world. What is going to happen to you, if Jesus had girl friend. Do you have? If yes, enjoy with her. If dont, try to get.

Your life is real. Enjoy it. Dont bother about someone else. That too who have lived some hundreds of years ago.

2006-06-22 22:07:42 · answer #4 · answered by murali_siddharth 2 · 0 0

Jesus' ministry on the earth was for all mankind. If you read the bible you will notice that not once did Jesus do anything for himself. Having a girlfriend would be for his own pleasure.
Also the Old Testament (which is before the time of Christ) points towards Christ. Many of the treaching, stories, people, are Christ like. That doesn't mean that they are Christ. Its sort of like a prophecy of what Christ will be like.
And not one single place does it ever mention Jesus having a girlfriend/ having a wife/ having kids.
If Jesus did have any of these why would the scriptures hide them? Jesus wouldn't want to hide the truth if it was truth.

2006-06-22 19:47:47 · answer #5 · answered by Smart_Guy 4 · 0 0

Not in the Bible, but in a number of the other gospels written before and around the time of the New Testament.

The disciples were not 'all men', the named apostles were - you should read a bit before you make daft statements. Some of the main leaders in the early church were women - they were not 'token'.

2006-06-22 20:01:43 · answer #6 · answered by Trish D 5 · 0 0

It's not an omission which would imply there was something that happened but which wasn't written about, it simply didn't happen. Jesus was very radical about associating with women which was not considered a good idea in his day. He broke all the social 'rules' and norms of his day.

2006-06-22 21:16:48 · answer #7 · answered by good tree 6 · 0 0

In the Bible Jesus is called 'Rabbi', which implies Jesus was married.
As for the other answers that said that Jesus was the son of God, there is nothing in the Bible that says so. It is implied, though. Then again, in those days, very religious Jews were all called the son of God.

2006-06-22 20:49:08 · answer #8 · answered by The Phantom 4 · 0 0

dont know of any call girl on dope in the bible .
but the gay thing seems likely
and all that talk about love ,apart from wearing a dress,
maybe that was just fashion ,maybe not

although his descendents must have come from some where
so many mysteries
so much unsaid
and when it was said was it really the truth
but nothing for me to worry about ,since i am a Pagan

2006-06-22 19:40:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There is NO evidence in the Holy Bible that Jesus Christ had a Girlfriend or Wife, or for that matter any kind of sex..

2006-06-22 19:39:59 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers