2006-06-22 11:00:58 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Neither... both are equally important. None of us would be here if not for the both of them.
2006-06-22 11:02:11 · answer #1 · answered by topher 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither, they were equally important. Without them, nobody would have been conceived and born. While Eve was taken from Adam, it is just as important that Eve took a bite of the forbidden fruit...and gave some to Adam too. Furthermore, God could have made Eve without taking her from Adam.
2006-06-22 11:08:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Important for whom? Cause well apparently Adam was not the first to be created the was another person created with Adam, then God created another after them a women for Adam, then finally God created Eve, But I would have to say Adam Cause without him we wouldn't have Eve or Sin or anything really.
2006-06-22 11:04:04 · answer #3 · answered by raider_way 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Adam, he was created first. If Eve would have eaten from the tree all by herself then she would have been cast out of the garden and Adam would have been given a new wife. But since Adam disobeyed-the more important one, the head of the family, the one who God put in charge of everything at the time- they were both cast out and became dying sinners.
2006-06-22 12:04:33 · answer #4 · answered by P-nut 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok a lot of people on here are going to say Adam. Either because they are a male and they feel that men are superior or because he was made first. Regardless you need to look at this threw God's eyes. Now...if God was thinking to himself and said "Who is more important Adam or Eve?" who do you think He would choose? Both. Because God created us all equal. God views us all as His children. So neither is more important. Not in God's eyes anyways.
2006-06-22 11:07:58 · answer #5 · answered by kaycee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Adam
2006-06-22 11:08:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eve. Adam was an experiment. God fixed the problems with the second try
2006-06-22 11:06:19 · answer #7 · answered by Bethany L 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There was no adam and eve. It is entirely impossible for a species to have been totally propogated from two individuals. After 4-5 generations, the the mutations caused from inbreedig would be too much, and extinction wold be inevitable.
After 4-5 generations, the members of that family would be too retarded to even know how to breed.
2006-06-22 11:03:49 · answer #8 · answered by RED MIST! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Adam I guess, but then you would have to have the Eve for the Adam. Since I am a woman I guess it would have to be Eve.
2006-06-22 11:06:00 · answer #9 · answered by ♥Sunflower 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eve cos she got the best bits from Adam ha ha
2006-06-22 11:03:24 · answer #10 · answered by janeysmithster 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I suppose that suggesting one was more important than another is kind of misleading.
Adam was first, but that does not make him more important...Satan spoke to Eve but that does not make her less than him. God, has told us that He made woman a help mate. Yet in proverbs 31, there is a lengthy scripture that tells us the importance that a woman plays in the life of her husband. Not, as a lesser person, but a strong and capeable woman, managing her job as well as her husband does his.
The New Testament tells us that women who are submitting to their husbands are doing so out of obedience to God, not because their husband is oh so wise and great. Rather, God gave them a place, and man a place...but both have different responsibilities. Neither is less...just different.
2006-06-22 11:08:21 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋