Or will the USA only go after the dictators they know they can beat. ( Of course they really can't beat the Flintstone era military of Afganistan and Iraq) Come to think of it the USA has been beat by North Korea, North Vietnam, Somalia, Lebanon, and of course Iran in the year of Nov 1979. ( I bet Iran can do it again )
2006-06-22 09:52:20 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
america doesn't give a **** about other people, they've supported probably half the dictators around the world at one time or another, we supplied both iraq and afghanistan with weapons when it was in our best interest. The wmd thing is bullshit, do you really think the united states would attack country that actually had nukes? of course not that's we invaded iraq and not north korea
2006-06-22 14:01:50 · answer #1 · answered by mel18 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The US doesn't go after dictators as a matter of routine. It did go after Saddam because of his continued disregard for the UN charter, that he agreed to,following Desert Storm in 1990. In addition to that, Saddam was up to good in many other ways, too.
He continued to shoot at US warplanes patrolling the no-fly zone agreed to in the UN Charter. His regime is said to have killed over 300,000 people during his watch. It is alleged that he accumulated a sizable arsenal of WMD's, which I believe to be true.
Isn't it amazing that the US has been beat by all these countries, yet still manages to scare the sh*it out of anyone that avoids standing toe to toe with it, in combat. I think you have your facts a little twisted douche bag. I believe you are just trying to piss me off, sh it for brains. The fact is, when I'm done writing this, I plan on saying a prayer for you. You need help, you poor bastard, and I'm the one that can see that you get it.
2006-06-22 18:04:15 · answer #2 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No The USA are going after the little fish. that will become bigger fish if the dick tator above him is taken out. So the best thing to do is start with the minnows and slowly work Their way up the chain of command until you get the top man. So if i were you, I would start changing your routines of day to day life.Just to be on the safe side, be very careful out there. Because who do you think could be next. maybe even YOU.
2006-06-22 21:54:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if the dictators stupid enough to boost againts the United States,and he got the abbilities to realize the threat to the United States.And off course it should be a country that has an influence among the other countries.
2006-06-22 22:05:46 · answer #4 · answered by Eldha'sfather 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We could soooo take over Cuba - it's really small. We don't though. Fidel is a horrible dictator to his people. We have to let them into our country when they float over on tires and dolphins. We should take him out but we don't.
2006-06-22 16:57:09 · answer #5 · answered by jessica 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am ashamed of you all. Your mothers would be embarrassed by your statements about he USA. Only if they attack us or kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people. We do not get beat, we have you all to get us to leave before job is done.
2006-06-22 17:12:07 · answer #6 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
usa can take any 1 u mother ******* peice of ****, what are u , are u tryin to disgrace America u ****** *** *****, and we will probably go after them in time
2006-06-22 16:58:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You must recognize that the US supported (and supports) corrupt and brutal governments that block democracy and development.
read my link for details.
2006-06-22 17:08:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Historicly there has never been anything but DICTATORS of one sort or another....just various concepts of FREEDOM.....
2006-06-22 17:05:38 · answer #9 · answered by BILL P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! If they harbor terrorists.
2006-06-22 17:01:44 · answer #10 · answered by merdenoms 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋