2006-06-22 09:09:59 · 6 answers · asked by Giggly Giraffe 7 in Environment
Replacing one species will do nothing.
You must make sure it has a working food chain to guarantee its survival. Also, the replenishing will put stress on other organisms survival. Therefore you might have to replenish more than one species.
2006-06-22 10:17:28 · answer #1 · answered by kfckiller06 3 · 4⤊ 4⤋
I think that most people think it is important to save the animals,birds and insects that are endangered.I say why not save the trees and forests all over the world.Because without them there will be no need to save the other species.So without a doubt saving the trees/forests is an important responsibility for every human involved. In replenishing what we ourselves are endangering....our own world without forests will be a very cold and dead world.
2006-06-22 11:32:58 · answer #2 · answered by DreamWeaver 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
An honest human being who truly knows that the world does not revolve around him/her. If we had more of those, I suspect we'd have a lot fewer endangered species of any other kind.
2006-06-22 09:17:29 · answer #3 · answered by honeynubbin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bald Eagle because it is our nations bird
2006-06-22 09:13:52 · answer #4 · answered by pdanielleh 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All of them
2006-06-22 13:05:37 · answer #5 · answered by aimeemay 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Honest Politicians... oh wait, they're extinct...
2006-06-22 10:02:28 · answer #6 · answered by Jamie Q. 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋