English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How can people say "I blame the person that sent the soldiers there for their deaths?" That is as good as saying "It's not the terrorists fault that is just what they do" The famous line that one nation divided against each other cannot stand rings loudly in my mind when I think of this statement. Do you all think that the terrorist don't know how weak out country really is? It shouldn't matter if you believe in the war but stop backing the terrorists by denying that they are truly at fault for their murders. Our American soldiers are punished by death at times for murdering Iraqi's inhumanely and America cheers. Our soldiers are killed and instead of wishing death upon those who killed us they accuse those who didn’t. Go ahead. Tell me what your thinking.

2006-06-22 08:56:32 · 11 answers · asked by 20mommy05 5 in Politics & Government Military

11 answers

i'm thinking you're right on the money.


rani...aha the truth comes out..we're the enemy and we're always going to be the enemy because we support Israel. Let's cut the crap shall we and get down to the truth...you people just hate the thought that Israel even exists...you will never accept it as a nation..never respect it's sovereignty, and never forgive the U.S. for supporting Israel. Well it's going to stay that way so get used to it.

But you know what..there was another option...we could have stayed home..and let you all deal with saddam. We could have let saddam take over kuwait, then invade saudi. Then let Iraq and Iran fight it out some more....and the first damned time one American..just one...was murdered..by some terrorist hijacker...or some building was blown up, just one incident on American soil, and we turn that entire area into a glass parking lot and say theres your freaking palestinian homeland....you want it that way..you ungrateful piece of camel ****?

2006-06-22 13:43:31 · answer #1 · answered by RunningOnMT 5 · 0 0

Yes the terrorist hit our twin towers in NY. Yes the terrorist killed over 2,000 people that day not to mention the brave souls on United 93, not to mention the people in the pentagon (which I believe by seeing, was a missle and not an airplane), But I also blame the President. Because he has killed more Americans in this war than the terrorist did on that day. The sad reality is that our American men and women are still being killed. Are the terrorist to blame. well YES......as well as the President. I wonder if President Bush would send anyone in his family over to Iraq to fight in the war. No, and you know why. To all of those Mothers, Fathers, Brothers, Sisters, Husbands, Wives, and children who have lost a love one in this nonsense war, my heart goes out to all of you.

2006-06-22 09:19:02 · answer #2 · answered by bunnicula 4 · 0 0

People blame the President for sending our troops into an unnecessary war that has cost thousands of our soldiers lives. He claimed that Iraq was a part of the 9/11 attacks, and there was no evidence to support that. People opposed to the President do not support the terrorists, we despise what they are doing and pray everyday for the safety of all our soldiers.

2006-06-22 09:20:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i think of the terrorists will "try" any new President. Obama will fail the try, attempt to barter and which will bring about extra assaults. The terrorists knew Carter replace right into a gutless wimp and for this reason extra problems took place under his watch. Reagan replace into difficult and that they knew it. for this reason the topics have been solved at the same time as he replace into President. Clinton, yet another wimp, permit al Qaeda get greater. And for the answerers that for sure haven't any recollection of previous activities, the twin Towers have been bombed in 1993. i think 5 people have been killed and over a million,000 injured. Clinton did no longer something!!!! we've had assaults at domicile formerly 9/11. we've had assaults at US embassies, that are seen the soverign territory of the country of the embassy. In 1998, U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania have been bombed by making use of Muslim extremists. as quickly as back, Clinton did no longer something. and of direction the united statesCole replace into attacked in 2000. Clinton allowed bin encumbered to stay and get a greater following. that's what led to 9/11/01. we are in hassle if Osama...oops...Obama is President!

2016-10-31 07:40:13 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It's an ill-formed question. "Terrorist" has become a meaningless word in common parlance. Are you talking about insurgents in Iraq, or Al Qaeda, or the Janjaweed, or a "rogue" government party like the Taliban? Or are you talking about an individual or group that uses violence against innocent people to instill fear and force change? ...such as the Israeli government, the former PLO, the former IRA, the Former Soviet Republic, the former Timothy McVeigh, Activist Abortion Protesters, the Bush Regime, Slobodan Milosevic, Charles Taylor, John Muhammad and Lee Malvo (though they had no discernible political goal).

As an American, I'd like to support our President, but as a so-called, enlightened human being, I can't countenace his decisions and policies. To answer your question: "Neither"!

2006-06-22 09:36:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

runnin on mt..
No, we dont hate israel just like we dont hate americans. but we do hate both governements. you say we dont respect israel but when did israel ever respect us. why should israel invade Lebanon and occupy for years when it already had Palestine? why did the israeli kill innocent Lebanese children and women for years and not be punished for it because it has america's support. and do u really think that ur president came to iraq to free the land? oh come on, u cant be this dumb. it's all about the money, its all about the oil. im not saying saddam is an angel, but at least there wasnt daily bloodshed at his time. i even think that this whole war thing is just a play, and im sure sometime somewhere Bush, Saddam, and Bin Laden are having a good dinner and joking about how they are fooling the world. so wake up! we're not ungrateful, we just dont want savage barbaric blood sucking assholes to come steal our land and oil!

2006-06-22 10:31:07 · answer #6 · answered by rani 1 · 0 0

You make a valid point, but I still blame the sender. Our soldiers wouldn't be getting killed if they hadn't been sent over there for a purposeless war my opinion, and yes I was over there. Question for a question why do you call them terrorists? Last I remember we went running over there.

2006-06-22 09:05:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Anonamus is right.
Osama and GWB are the same. Using rhetoric and terror to manipulate a the brainwashed, dumbed-down masses.
All rulers do this, and will continue to to so until the Ruled are ready to be responsible for and rule themselves as individuals.

2006-06-22 09:22:56 · answer #8 · answered by kevin g 3 · 0 0

The President & terrorists are one in the same...

2006-06-22 08:59:05 · answer #9 · answered by ConspiracyExaminer 3 · 0 0

i agree. if we didnt send them over there, what do u think would of happend, they probably still be doin attacks over here, wake up and open ur eyes u stupid idoit, if we do get attacked, i hope its where u live so i wont have to listen to u kind of ppls sayin we are doin nothing over there

2006-06-22 09:42:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers