I do. It's all part of NAFTA. They have big plans for 4 football-fields-wide type highways from Mexico to Canada. I understand a Spanish company got the contract. It's all part of the plan to eliminate the middle class in America called class warfare and part of the New World Order.
What Ethan said.
2006-06-22 06:49:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sati 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just because the North American Free Trade Agreement has opened up trade between the three countries does not mean that there will be any political unity or merger. If that was the case, why would the USA be concerned with illegal immigrants from Mexico?
2006-06-22 06:46:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Raymond C 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
facts:
www.spp.gov
www.unitednorthamerica.org (not gov. owned, but by people who want to merge USA and CDN, whcih I do agree)
I like the idea of a NAU and just askes a Q on it. But I don't like how Mexico is involved. Mexico is a corrupted nation with a horrific overpopulation! How can we include them in our union?'
On the other hand an NAU may be the only serious way to compete with emerging world threats to our dominance, such as Indian, China, Eu, etc..
and the world is globalizing whether we like it or not. There is some kind of South american alliance just like the EU being discussed, Eu, and now this NAU.
With mexico's overpopulation I don't know how they will assimiliate into the US & Canada. Now there is talks of a highway to stretch from the lowest parts of Mexico to the begnings of Canada (as another answerer posted)
2006-06-22 06:49:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No considering who has the main to offer/lose to this "union". What available income could there be for individuals? Regard the truly value in money of rectify 3 very distinctive governments, a minimum of three distinctive languages, correcting an exceedingly corrupt Mexican social equipment and propping up the money equipment of our new companions. whether our cutting-edge financial subject did no longer exist this nonetheless seems value prohibitive. i think we can gain each and all of the helpful out comes from this sort of unification with the aid of extra proactive commerce and social regulations. There’s constantly the previous maxim “sturdy fences make sturdy associates”; it isn’t approximately isolation it’s approximately comprehend from the two aspects. kinfolk like relationships must be labored on constantly, they are constantly maximum suitable while it’s a journey.
2016-10-31 07:27:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Congressman Tancredo is having hearings to find out what this is about.
However, I find it interesting that the people on the 'working task force' for this in the US are such a big secret 'so they won't be bothered by the public' when their Canadian counterparts are listed on their governmental web pages. Apparently CANADA considers this a big deal. The Bush adminstration, on the other hand seems to consider it a big secret.
2006-06-22 07:15:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by DAR 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I realize this it is called the Security and Prosperity Premier. This would allow people from Mexico and Canada to travel to the US as easily as we travel between states.
2006-06-22 06:42:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ethan M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree 100%. I follow this issue closely. Very closely. We will see it occur within our lifetime. It is the #1 priority for multinational corporations to make sure this happens. There is HUGE pressure on governments to make this happen. Alot of money is on the line. And unfortunately, money ALWAYS wins out in the end. It is unfortunate that the world is headed in this direction. It is even more unfortunate for American workers. Their already stagnant wages will begin to plummet.
2006-06-22 06:43:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by bootstrap 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Best rundown of what's going on with this NAU plan here:
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=14965
I don't think Americans will go for it. You can listen to an interview with the author of that article: http://www.israelnationalradio.com/
He's said that the story should reach the mainstream media soon. So, this should become a hot topic.
2006-06-26 15:20:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by mo mosh 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perhaps. But when WWIII starts (more than likely because of George Bush), it'd be nice to have those two on our side. The way Bush handles things, they may be the only ones.
2006-06-22 06:40:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Uh huh, show me facts.
However, there will be a controvercial mega highway built from Mexico up to Oklahoma.
2006-06-22 06:40:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by eric 3
·
0⤊
0⤋