2006-06-22 03:52:37 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No,they won't.If America is smart enough I don't think they'll mess with Iran.'Cos Iran it's not Iraq or Afghanistan.And US doesn't have the financial and human resources to start another war.It would be lost from the start.
2006-06-22 04:02:45 · answer #1 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
There are two possibility: 1) If the neocons would win the elections (Cheney, Rumsfeld, John Bolton all are supporting strongly the war against Iraq-Iran) a war is strongly possible in one year. 2) On the other hand, in the presidential elections if Hilary Clinton would win, we know she also supports the war against Iran, so a war is possible in two years. But I think Iran would not stress the situation to the end point and get a step back. The issue is Iran's REGIME, not having nuclear. Hamaney is just taking the nuclear problem to the forefront to unite Iranians against an external enemy, to ensure the regime's guarantee. If he does not do that, US's democratic tellings would unite Iranians against the religious-totalitarian regime of Hamaney's Iran.
2006-06-22 05:00:41 · answer #2 · answered by begum84 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Negotiation will end the whole show, can't you see how many brethren already wasted in the Afghanistan and Iraq, and by the time we are on Iran neck, Nostradamus said the War head will hit the states, and probably from North Korea, but leaving the fight of Iran the twin city fight, will made the war to erode for a long time , than the actual time, there is still time for the third world war to start
2006-06-22 04:07:32 · answer #3 · answered by aliajao 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I unquestionably have a query, are you ignorant. EDITE: oh my god, are all of you ignorant. First an fairly small % of Iran are terrorist 2d people who're. would be underground, are interior the mountains. So bombing will purely finally end up killing reg voters. which might, finally end up angering maximum of Europe. because of the fact it's going to cause them to seem undesirable. so as that they're going to take Iran section. Then a considerable warfare could desire to wreck out. Plus their isn't any nuclear software, that became a lie from the taking off to get the folk to settle for this stupid small scale warfare. sorry i'm new to english
2016-12-08 11:28:24 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush has to let oil/gas prices stabilize for a while longer before he can line his pockets and push them up more by attacking Iran.
2006-06-22 03:58:31 · answer #5 · answered by sideshot72 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so... its not worth. Iran president is just trying to catch media attention and America is not that stupid to fall on this trap and give this president a satisfaction.
2006-06-22 04:16:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOWAY. ONLY THE AMERICANS THINK SO. USA IS VERY
SCARRED & BEGGING THE WORLD TO GO ALONG.ITS ONLY PUBLICITY, BECAUSE BUSH`S BUSH IS ON FIRE DUE TO JEALOUSY THAT A NON-AMERICAN & TINY MUSLIM COUNTRY HAS THE GUTS TO DEFY USA.
MAYBE THEY WANT TO DEMLISH FEW MORE SKYSCRAPERS BUT DONT WANT TO SPEND ON IT,SO
THIS TYPE OF PUBLICITY.CHEAPER BY THE DOZEN TOO.
HAS HE NOT LEARNT ENOUGH FROM VIETNAM &IRAQ
LET ALL OUR BROTHERS AND SISTERS IN IRAN FEEL SAFE
THE WORLD IS AT THEIR SIDE.
.
2006-06-22 04:01:57 · answer #7 · answered by bharat b 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can only hope so....then we should fill it up w/ water, make it a great big lake, setup some condos and stuff.
2006-06-22 03:56:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they'll hold out until after August to "exhaust" all diplomacy.
2006-06-22 03:56:21 · answer #9 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Bush has anything to do with it!
2006-06-22 03:54:43 · answer #10 · answered by Truth Seeker 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋