English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Mustard Gas and Sarin found in Iraq by troops who stumbled on the weapons cache. A cache that Sadaam denied having and claimed was destroyed.

I've had Chemical,Biological,And Radiation Safety Training,and these found Chemical Weapons fall under the Category of Weapons of Mass Destruction

Some of the weapons are considered Pre-1991 and some are said to be Post-1991(although that shouldn't be an issue.Just having them should be the issue)

Where's the outrage from republicans here?

Where's the Apology from Democrats here?

As I've stated in Past Q&A's: I'm an Independent who thinks Bush is a Lame Duck when it comes to Domestic Issues....
But support his Foriegn Policy.....

So as an Independent I ask again:Bush Did Not Lie About WMD's,Just as Clinton Did Not Lie about Iraq having them.,So wheres the Outrage????????????

2006-06-21 16:39:03 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

sry 4 the Typo

2006-06-21 16:48:53 · update #1

13 answers

You'll never hear it. I'm afraid they shy away from evidence. If you notice they tend to gang up on one particular question and spew venom at the president but are very weak on evidence. The best they do is quote the latest from CNN

2006-06-21 16:47:46 · answer #1 · answered by RunningOnMT 5 · 1 0

I was just skimming through Yahoo answers when I found you're question and I've got to say that I would think this would be big news. I hadn't heard about it before (I currently live in Vietnam, so I don't get much news in English), but I would think that it would at least make the news on Yahoo's front page. I'm an independent too, but since I've been out of the country I don't keep up with politics that much. I did get to see Fahrenheit 911 the other day on HBO Asia for the first time and I started thinking about all of the "WMD" issues again and could not believe that they never found anything in Iraq. It just didn't make sense, so this news isn't all that surprising I guess. But it does seem now that maybe some people were a little too critical of the intelligence before the war.

2006-06-21 17:06:38 · answer #2 · answered by doug_coomer 2 · 0 0

If all you chickenhawks - zeppellen, runnin on mt, Eros21, Snowy, joustingwindmills - believe the lie that WMDs exist, then why aren't you signing up to go to Iraq? If you believe in the cause so much, prove it by proving you have the balls to go and fight.



Where and when were the WMDs found? I can more easily prove that the US government voluntarily gave up and admitted there weren't any.

The only WMDs in Iraq after 1993, for clueless people such as yourself, were the WMDs the US has been using against Iraqis, most notably in Falujja.

Deniers and liars like you really believe in the Nazi maxim, don't you? "If you tell the lie often enough, people will eventually believe it." Guess what: it won't work.

2006-06-21 17:25:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the super-liberal press never reports early on good news that is complementary to the conservatives. I am not a conservative or liberal but I try to be fair and supportive of what I feel is right for America. The WMD found are still destructive and can kill many thousands of people. Saddam said there were no more weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Who was stupid enough to believe him with the exception of Hans Blix? Most of the modern WMD were shipped to Syria and the Israelis told the US government specifically where they were. In time the US troops will find additional WMD in Iraq and the liberal press will mention it briefly only on page 12.

2016-03-27 00:33:55 · answer #4 · answered by Cindy 4 · 0 0

Well said my brother, well said. Just like an American soldier can look at an iraqi prisoner wrong and be accused of a war crime by the bleeding hearts, and infadel a-qaeda-taliban-insurgents. But-!! When they capture American soldiers, or Coalition soldiers, they can mutilate them, drag them through the streets, and behead them and then plant explosives on them in hopes of killing more people, that's okay-no news coverage-business as usual! Other countries callous disregard of life will be the future reason for their discontent of a prolonged, unfullfilling, desolate life.

2006-06-23 20:05:11 · answer #5 · answered by phwar68 5 · 0 0

The "I am sorry" rarely comes from a Democrat, maybe that is why there divorce rate is higher. I thought it was for low morals like Clinton. I still say Na-Na Boo Boo - I love being right. Loyal Republican & loyal to the United State of America & their Military!

2006-06-21 16:52:41 · answer #6 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0 0

1.what is your proof that these weapons were found.
2,what are their sizes.this is important.
3.do you know that these chemical agents are never weapons of mass destruction,since their effect is very little.these gases were used in ww1.
4.do you know that usa was the first country to help the iraqi army establishing the chemical,biologicaland nuclear warfare in 1966,and it trained the first batch of iraqi army officers there,some of them are still alive.
5.do you know that usa supplied chemical arms to iraq to be used against iuran,and usa was the first country to condemn iran od striking halabja and killing 5000 kurds,go back to the news of 1987.
6.give me a name of one country in the world who dosent have sarine and musterad gases.
7.do you know how much of wmd dose israiel has,or israel should have previlages that no one must have.
8.why israel was not asked why it used napalm in 67 war.
here we have two balances.you want a rabbit,take a rabbit,you want a deer,take a rabbit.

2006-06-21 21:23:16 · answer #7 · answered by adm_maaf 4 · 0 0

Having raged for years that "Bush lied and people died," just like "MC Hummer," they won't have the moral courage to admit that they were wrong, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.


To be a liberal and democrat, it is a requirement that you be able to blind yourself to the truth on a constant basis.

2006-06-21 19:49:16 · answer #8 · answered by joustingwindmills 3 · 0 0

Unfortunately the anti bush / anti american / anti republican / anti war / anti everything brigade have reached the stage of conspriacy theory and hatred for anything conservative that they will probably believe that the U.S, no actually George himself, planted the weapons there.

Some people have now become so blind in their hatred of 50% of their own countrymen that you will never win the argument.

2006-06-21 19:18:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the demorats don't accept the fact that saddam used chemicals on his own people was a use of WMD's it does not support their "Bush lied" agenda

2006-06-22 03:59:14 · answer #10 · answered by jordanjd4 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers