2006-06-21 14:59:03 · 3 answers · asked by coon 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
as dangerous as they both may be, we cant and wont go to war with either of those 2 countries or anyone else unless they directly attack us ... cheney /bush saw to that... and now we are in a real bad sittuation with all our potential enemies .... or maybe not... maybe now we we will be forced to learn how to negotiate fairly, magnaomously with the rest of the world instead of pushing our weight around..... thanks cheney/ bush we're gonna come out of this a better country .... youse on the other hand will burn in hell!
2006-06-21 15:09:49 · answer #1 · answered by ong jon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on who shoots their missiles at us first. Someone has misled them into thinking we will not bomb them. We do not need to fire nuclear weapons, we have bombs large enough to hit key areas & take out their country. With the agreement with the Europeans it is easy to "lock and load" and fly again. It will not leave a lot of country but more than a nuclear weapon would & no danger to surrounding countries. They are leaving no choices.
2006-06-21 17:06:40 · answer #2 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if i were in your shoes i would be worried. i believe korea is the next world hotspot. then again the yankee doodles have alot of enemies. having said that i am glad i live next to uncle sam rather than the middle east. don't worry though your bros. from up north will be there when you need some sneaky potshot snipers. i believe we have saved your bacon before and probably will again.
2006-06-21 15:08:57 · answer #3 · answered by rpm53 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋