I am almost 30 and I'm still single, with no children. I'm waiting patiently to find that special mate, but as I wait, am I at risk?
2006-06-21 07:15:53 · 34 answers · asked by Prayerwarrior 3 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
birth
2006-06-21 07:18:04 · answer #1 · answered by bones54 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
your clock started ticking the day you were born. You are not at risk for anything. We will all have our ending date and life continues to go on. If you want children, that is a bit different because the risk of the child having health problems such as down syndrome which is the number one health problem that arises for women who are over 30. If you desperatly want a child and dont mind being married and or having a mate to share the parenting then adopt , in vitro..ect. There are so many ways to become pregnant with out having sex.
2006-06-21 07:20:22 · answer #2 · answered by aruba 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I just talked to my mom about this the other day. She is in her mid 40's and I am in my early 20's. She had me when she was 24 and I have a younger brother she had when she was 40...so she said 20's was to early and 40's is a little late. 30's would have been a perfect time for her. It is different for different people, but you are still young you have a lot of time to have children and still be healthy and be there for them. I dont see any rush. Take care and enjoy your single life before you meet someone and have children. Best of Luck to you!
2006-06-21 07:20:25 · answer #3 · answered by missesbean 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
30 and single with no children? It could be much, much worse. It could have been 30, single and with several children. Now, THAT would have been tragic.
And regarding "that special mate", don't worry, he'll come along, because he's also looking for you. Just like Cheap Trick sings::
Hey little ladies
There's a cool young dude
Just standin' in line
Waiting for you...
...There's always something for everyone".
2006-06-21 07:26:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No-one is at risk, be assured, we are all going to die, no risk involved, it's guaranteed. In the meantime you've left it a bit late for finding a mate get proactive like yesterday, after 32 pregnancy is a trial and you don't want to be raising small children in 'middle age' which is a misnomer in any event I was old aged at 40.
2006-06-21 07:23:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You go by the name PrayerWarrior yet you seek the advice of the unrighteous on a question that only God can control. I'm confused?
When it's the season for you to marry you will marry, when it's the season for you to have children you will have them. Sarah concived at the age of 90, granted in those days 90 was probably the equivalent to 30, however it was still past her child-bearing years, so much that she doubted God's word...you know the story.
At anyrate, have faith that if it's God's will it will be. Pray and make your request known unto God and let him take care of the rest.
Grace and Peace.
2006-06-21 07:22:17 · answer #6 · answered by Brandy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please wait for the right person you are not at risk. Biological clock is: peer/parent/family pressure. You will know when the right person comes along, because you will be totally in sync. Be patient, he is out there and you will find each other, by God's Grace.
2006-06-21 07:22:24 · answer #7 · answered by Missykat 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't get in too much of a hurry. 30 is gettin up there, but most risks don't start til 35. if u really want kids and it comes down to it, u can try to conceive the unconventional way. sperm banks. this way u don't need a man. but raising a child is very difficult to do alone. have u tried any online dating services? i know they sound awful, but they're supposedly very successful at what they do.
2006-06-21 07:21:45 · answer #8 · answered by jenniferb 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
45
2006-06-21 07:17:37 · answer #9 · answered by euro_hunk2 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mine began at sixteen. I dont think of it replace into began by making use of any particular journey. I constantly knew that i needed infants and that i replace into going to have one youthful. when I became sixteen (under no circumstances been kissed, nonetheless a virgin) I knew that i replace into going to have a sprint one interior the year 2000, i assumed i could have one while i replace into 18. I met the affection of my life no longer long when I informed my Mum of my plans to have a baby. After 2 years and 2nd time having intercourse I fell pregnant. I lost that toddler however. I fell pregnant back some months later and had my darling daughter in December of 2000. i replace into 19 and 3 months. I then went directly to have my 2nd daughter at 21.
2016-10-31 06:08:43 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a 'biological tick' is fancy for 'I want to have a baby damnit'
You still have a good 10 years before a pregnancy would be considered 'high risk'
2006-06-21 07:18:34 · answer #11 · answered by mytrollinid 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋