The trend in Australia has prompted an overhaul of Industrial Relations and Workplace Laws at a federal level, reducing the unemployment rate to the lowest it has been for 50 years, due to the increasing number of people with part time or, more prevalantly, casual employment status, and a rapidly decreasing number of full time status employees, and the percentage of persons that remain in full time positions for over 5 years has plummetted also, meaning an increase in all of the overhead cost areas you mentioned in the question. The other side effect not expected by this change is that companies are now far more liquid than ever, with the potential for a company to begin day 1, have a full staff the next day, and dissolve the day after with no obligations to employees. This system has abolished all non-essential conditions, rights and privelidges previously mandatory, such as paid sick leave, annual leave, long service leave, travel allowance, meal allowance, standard hours, minimum hours, maximum hours, minimum wage, even such simplicities as paid meal, drink and toilet breaks. It is also degrading the standards of quality produce (performance eval), given that women in the 80's had the equal rights movement, and now expect special treatment for child bearing. Is that equal and fair? Career planning has gone out the window, being replaced with short term wage paid positions, so many of which exist that we are having to import labouring persons from third world countries. All of this comes from the femme-nazis in politics, such as the Prime Minister's wife and daughter.
2006-06-28 07:12:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bawn Nyntyn Aytetu 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
?? Oh those poor men. Are you serious? The problem you see here is that guys can't sell their bodies? Hello, these women are selling themselves to go to university. That's not a good thing. It wouldn't be a good thing for young men to do either.
2016-05-20 08:50:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋