I understand that there was a regime change but it appears more that the new regime in Iraq is the Bush Administration. It looks like we took over the country when that's not the case. I think the New Iraqi government should be more visible to the Arab World and start being diplomatic with other Muslim nations in that area, which could possibly quiet the insurgents.
2006-06-20 23:41:13 · 11 answers · asked by pickle head 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
We are trying to get them to do it for themselves!Guess they are just slow to nurture...It does look like we rule there but we dont..we simply set some points for them and its up to them to follow thru..I think they will in time..It cant be easy and they have to deal with violence every day as they try to set goals..Good luck to them!
2006-06-21 02:28:53 · answer #1 · answered by *toona* 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Put it this way....Iraq has been in control of its own country before this war started. Its people were miserable, illtreated, tortured, killed for not sharing the same beliefs.
The women had no rights. No education, could not speak up, had to sit and hide in the corner like mongrel dogs.
That is the main reason why our Governments stepped in! Obviously that tells you for a start that Iraq wasnt doing too well on its own.
As humans we all have rights. Although our rights might not be part of their religion never the less they have rights. The people were treated like animals. When I have seen what they are doing to our troops I now know why!
The new Iraqi Government has had a Prime Minister sworn in and a couple of people named, in charge of different sections.
Its been stated that once the New Iraqi Government takes over and proves that they have the country under complete control, our troops will be slowly withdrawn.
Judging from the bombings still taking place I would say that will be will be a long long time to come.
If the Iraqi people helped inform the soldiers about the rebels whereabouts/plans, they would be captured and dealt with. The Iraqis for once in their lives would have peace and our troops could come home. I guess when you put it into that perspective the Iraqis musnt mind too much the war/killings or the fact of our troops presence or they would get off their *sses and help themselves.
2006-06-21 07:08:14 · answer #2 · answered by >>>LADY<<< 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush has invaded Iraq to rule the Iraq, To kill the Iraqies and to use the Iraqi Oil. All the Tasks are being accomplished precisely by the Bush and his forces. All the rulers of Islamic countries are the part and parcel of Bush administration and they do not have any relation with their nations.
2006-06-21 07:23:28 · answer #3 · answered by breez 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great idea. In fact it's beginning to take place now. The Iraqi leader has recently spearheaded a plan to perform a national sweep with Iraqi troops and police in point position. The recent raids have produced a treasure trove of intel. The transition has begun and God willing it will be a fruitful one.
2006-06-21 06:58:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Understand that the Iraq`s really did not have an army .Just fearful people .Saddam made sure that the people had no rights . They could`nt fight against the Iranians even being supported by the Americans . So now that Saddam's out! the BUSHWHACKERS are in.
GOOD LUCK
2006-06-21 07:10:28 · answer #5 · answered by Dvplanetwaves 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Now is not the right time. The Iraqi government can not even control themselves, never mind their country, which at the moment is in chaos. I understand what you are saying, but it takes time. The Iraqi's will govern their own country, but they can't do it just yet!
2006-06-21 06:51:33 · answer #6 · answered by chrisnewcars 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why should the new gov't take control when Bush is doing it for them. Give them an inch and they take a yard; Thats what they are doing They dont really want this new gov't but they have to do something to make it look real. and to make is look like they are trying to take control I say put sadam back in control he had the country under control.
2006-06-21 06:51:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because if America leaves, it will be easy for a terrorist to regain control of iraq, and us sending troops back in would mean a higher death mark on U.S. troops. We need to stay and call the shots until iraq can prove to us that they are capable of taking care of themselves.
2006-06-21 08:59:53 · answer #8 · answered by cyberep 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if the government is weak they will want to follow what the president of america said. iraq government should stand on their own feet
2006-06-21 06:45:33 · answer #9 · answered by pianist 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah, lets make more efforts to hide that america controls Irak, spend more money sending out buffoons parading so other countries dont think Irak is controlled by america and is free.
2006-06-21 06:45:14 · answer #10 · answered by Sibbano 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋