Yes my Friend, what is God , It's believe and believe is in side you ,if you heart and mind is agree with you and then answer is yes.No God is for money making,but now These priests and other peoples made it money making sou res.
2006-06-20 21:00:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by lucky s 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
If U are a good man U can also be a god man.A monkey is not mentally corrupt like U.So I feel worshiping a monkey as a god is perfectly meaningful than having a doubting man as a friend!A monkey doent have any shop for making money!It shows animals are having divine qualities and man has vulgar thought and action!
2006-06-20 20:57:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by lotus cud 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You started with belief and that really ends the conversation. However, let me try to explain the difference between your religion Hinduism and mine with is Christianity.
Let me start with our most basic resource: The Christian Bible. The bible assumes (not proves) the existence of God. The bible is not a conversion manual, but a collections of bible that is the word of God as given to man by the prophets. This is the fundamental belief. It is my belief. We believe God created the heaven and the earth. We believe that God presented his name "I am that I am" to Moses: we believe that God keeps his promises: A savor name Jesus, who died, God raised Jesus from the dead (our hope for eternal life), and that Jesus will return again. We also belief that God is spirit (literally wind). Again we are talking about beliefs, and my belief that the bible which is the word of God, and since God is spirit, I do not believe that God in not a monkey man that became a god (a Hindu god).
I hope that answers your question.
2006-06-20 20:53:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by J. 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think He is only blessed by the God Hanuman as in another case in which 3 brothers had Hanuman ji like appearance as they were blessed by him on account of thier parents worshiped him and wanted to have children as pratapi(Hounoured) as Hanumanji -also as Hanumenji was blessed by sitaji to live forever and is also siad that today also he is alive and in deep jungles still worshiping Lord Ram
2006-06-20 21:11:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by greatguy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
the reply "because i understand" is an sufficient answer to concerns that be counted on subjective sensation no longer able to third-celebration verification, which includes "i understand I actually have a headache," that's an announcement that, oftentimes, in reality the guy perceiving the discomfort can ascertain. because that all of our information of the exterior international comes by neural-sensory idea, there's a subjective, phenomenological element inherent in our information. for this reason, the boundary between subjective and purpose information isn't as clearcut as some would prefer to believe. Epistemetology aside, there is both logical and clinical arguments that are actual compatable with the existence of a divine being. Kurt Godel, significantly recognized because the greates mathematical truth seeker of the twentieth Century, demonstated by modal common sense the validity of Saint Anselm's ontological argument for the existence of G-d. also, the demonstration by ability of Hubble in the 1920s that the cosmos replaced into no longer eternal and the answer of Einstein's field equations in the Sixties that indicated a advent adventure in accordance to a sigularity that had a volume of 0 (a calculation which even Stephen Hawking, an avowed atheist, has been unable to contradict) supplies a level of credibility to the idea of advent ex nihilo. the theory that technology and faith are inherently adverse has been disproved by ability of the fashion of scientists that are theists as well as by ability of the acceptance that technology bargains with empirical questions at the same time as faith bargains with fee questions and what John Polkinghorne, a Cambridge Ph.D. in quantum physics as well as an Anglican priest and theologian, calls meta-questions, exhibits that faith and technology function in diverse linguistic area names or language video games, to borrow Wittgenstein's terminology. this style of attack on faith is neither novel nor really cogent. those who would attack faith desire to study better about the non secular area, except they desire to easily pontificate to the switched over and communicate previous human beings on the different aspect of the talk. Grace be unto you and peace.
2016-10-14 08:52:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sorry, I am not a hindu. I only believe in God. Devote your time to him. He is the Messiah, our savior, the Great One.
2006-06-20 20:44:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Me too a hindu and I think he is there 2 make money
2006-06-24 20:14:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Pd 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only way that a " monkey man" can be "god" is if those are just initials, and they stand for, "Goofy On Drugs"!
;o)
2006-06-20 20:41:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Stargater 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They found out that it was a rare species of a monkey thats all,
it was in the news..
2006-06-21 15:35:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by raj_6c1 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a way for some one to make money
2006-06-20 20:40:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by becky h 1
·
0⤊
0⤋