If the New Testament is full of errors, does that matter? Or does the message come trough?

Question

For those of you looking for the errors I speak of, read Misquoting Jesus by Bart Ehrman. It's a light read and very informative.

Answer 1

In an odd way, sweet_shy is right. Sure, there are translation errors and parts of it may have been added or deleted, but it's still God's work. It was divinely inspired; the only part that really matters is the message, and do you really think that he would let his message be corrupted? The rest is just fluff to make it readable. Now having read the New Testament, I find that what I read is entirely in line with my knowledge of God. I think the message comes through just fine and there are no errors in it despite whatever stages the actual text has gone through.

Answer 2

Yes it does matter. Jesus was a Jewish rabbi. He was a good "man". Somehow Paul, who never met Jesus, turned him into an incarnation of God. The Romans needed a way to suppress the Zealots. Creating a new religion to unify the Roman Empire and suppress the Jews is what the New Testament is all about. It pretty wild that so many people believe it all.

Answer 3

There are many errors, but the entire point of the new testament is to show morals, whats the point in worrying about petty errors, when you can believe that christ at least knew that peace was better than violence? If people cant find morals on their own, then I say let them have a book to tell them at least one good way to live.

Answer 4

if you read the Autherised Version of the Bible, otherwise known as the King James version, then there are NO errors whatsoever. The errors come from the modern translations which have been corrupted by the Vatican.
No there are no errors in the KJB and the messege of the Gospel comes through loud and clear, if you listen that is!

Answer 5

truly there have been ideas approximately this earlier Jesus got here, in any different case Jesus' parable in Luke sixteen concerning the wealthy guy (who went to hades) and the undesirable guy Lazarus (who went to Abraham's Bosom) might have made no experience in any respect to his hearers! One distinction between Jews and modern-day Christians is that Jews many times do no longer think of hell (Gehenna) lasts continually, yet purely for a optimum of a 12 months. The Christians did no longer insist on an infinite hell until the 5th and 6th centuries, decrease than Augustine interior the West and Emperor Justinian interior the East. the project is somewhat murky in that we don't comprehend precisely while the Hebrews reached this interest and while it became a fave concept. yet in 2 Maccabees 15:12-22, we do study that Judas Maccabeus had a resourceful and prescient of the extreme Priest Onias, and the Prophet Jeremiah, who have been interceding in heaven for the Jewish human beings. EDIT: Why a thumbs-down? i exploit logic approximately Luke sixteen, and a pre-Christian scripture (2 Maccabees) -- what approximately it particularly is unacceptable? Sheesh. @ Kelly: What you're saying is genuine, different than that most of the third and 4th century Christian instructors (Origen, Clement of Alexandria, Gregory of Nyssa, Gregory Nazianzen, etc.) taught that, after a time of purification, that finally one and all would be stored. This looks to have been replaced later by Augustine (who did no longer comprehend Hebrew or Greek) and Emperor Justinian (who purposefully inserted yet another be conscious interior the coaching to intend infinite punishment). @ Kelly: particular, Gehenna is hell. study Rabbi Akiba, "the 2d Moses," who mentioned: "The length of the punishment of the depraved in Gehenna is 3 hundred and sixty 5 days." Adyoth 3: 10. EDIT 2: Why do i've got self assurance Jehovah's witness prejudice here? hear, it is genuine that "Gehenna" became the rubbish unload outdoors the city partitions of Jerusalem. yet it particularly is used as an emblem for smash and being cut back off from God's human beings. And particular, it is sparkling that there became a seen reward and punishment after loss of existence, or back, Luke sixteen is senseless in any understand. Jason ok. is fullyyt surprising.

Answer 6

It depends on what you believe. I personally believe that the Bible is the un erred word of God. That does not mean though that every version they come out with though of the Bible is correct, that's where you depend on the Holy Spirit. I do believe that the King James version is as close to the original as we can come. If you can show me errors in that I am more than open to a debate.

Answer 7

yes they matter

its like a baseball game

did the cubs win 9 to 2 or did they win 9 to 2 in the 11th inning

that 11th inning means soooooo much

Answer 8

No, the NT is not FULL of errors.

But inspite of CERTAIN errors, the MESSAGE of Yeshua Messiah / Jesus Christ DOES COME THROUGH regardless...

Peace be with you!

Answer 9

the discrepancies are human.
we add our own discrepancies in the way we read it too. also human.
the spirit, though, is gonna make the message real for us - that's why you should read the Bible with an attitude of prayer. Try it!

Answer 10

Go to Christian apologetic sites before you decide about this.

http://debate.org.uk/topics/apolog/contrads.htm