Well there isn't exactly a bumper crop of good candidates on either side. But if it comes down to it, I would love to see Hitlery and Condi go at it. (My vote would go to Condi).
I try really hard to vote for the person and not the party, but it just seems that Democrats in this day and age are a bunch of whiny politically correct wimps.
I pray that Condi runs-I pray that McCain doesn't. I don't think there is a viable democrat out there, save for Lieberman, and he is going to get kicked out of the Donkey party-mark my words.
2006-06-20 13:47:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by kelly24592 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Right now I can't see a whole lot of difference between the Dems and Republicans. Scary, isn't it! I don't think I'll be voting for any democrats this time around. Not sure if I'll be voting for any Republicans either, though. May have to look long and hard at the independent party.
2006-06-20 09:24:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by just a mom 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First, ignorance and fear are not the ways to discuss and deal with terrorists. The worst terrorist attack on Americans under democratic leadership (Clinton) in the last 25 years was committed by Americans in Oklahoma City. Those who planned the worst attacks ever against Americans, under republican leadership (Bush II), were trained and funded by previous republican leadership (Reagan) in this country. We cannot assume that terrorists will attack America purely based on republican or democratic leadership. History has proven that when it comes to us the terrorists do not care who is in charge. If a major attack occurs after President Bush is out of office, most likely the attack would have been planned under his leadership. Therefore, if a republican is elected do you think the terrorists will stop their attack? Terrorism exists to bring about political change by the use of fear. Terrorists are seeking American political change in how we deal with the Muslim world, not by having a democrat or republican in office. Alos, history has proven, that when a country is the most powerful, as we are today, the greatest threat is from within. Polarization created by such questions leads to internal destablization, and if the root cause is terrorists, then they have won and the loser is those who ask such questions. Victory is when people unite over ignorance and fear and choose the path that leads to understanding and compassion, for those within and those we affect.
2006-06-20 09:33:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obviously the election of Hillary Clinton will get us more bombs. While I don't think this will get "America wiped off the face of the Earth (sic)" I do think this will earn us more attacks and hatred.
Neddie: LMAO... how do you think that Edwards, Gore, Kerry, OR your precious Hillary would have dealt with terrorism? Oh right, they would have sat in the oval office and felt safe knowing that when the bomb came, THEY were safe, regardless of the rest of us.
2006-06-20 09:24:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Goose&Tonic 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i imagine that hillary receives a foul rap. shes no longer the witch she is made out to be. aside his inexperience i see no longer some thing incorrect with obama. actually everyone looks to have already ruled it out, yet i imagine that Kerry would make a most suitable president. I talked about him talk in the course of the 2004 election and he sounded like he new what he replaced into doing and the workplace paintings replaced into all waiting, and if elected president he would set the country again so as. Jimmy Carter stated that he thinks Gore often is the most appropriate guy for the interest, and that i have distinctive understand for Carter;s opinion.
2016-10-14 08:31:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why is it that people in congress that makes laws and send our troops to Die in Iraq are being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars, yet our troops are getting paid next to nothing?
The answer is that all Partisan wants is to make money and broke the law they make and they don't care if you're poor or not as long as they can live off government money from our tax dollars.
2006-06-20 13:39:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obviously, we are getting ready for Al Gore, part deux. He's their best shot but is still doomed to lose in a landslide. Nobody is stupid enough to let him bring Kyoto to the US.
2006-06-20 09:26:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
RAR RAR DEMS R STOOPID HAHAHAHAHA
You partisan sh!theads will never learn, will you? Mudslinging doesn't end terrorism. Both sides are corrupt as hell and need to be reformed or dismantled.
2006-06-20 09:18:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
How old are you? 13? 14?
2006-06-20 09:21:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mr. October 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the current administration is doing a fine job of that on their own...
2006-06-20 09:21:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by pancho p 1
·
0⤊
0⤋