English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

if i am correct the law of biogenises states that only life can be derived from life. So where did the 1st DNa molecule come from?? Did all of the MILLION DNA bases come together by chance to make a functional primitive cell??? I

2006-06-20 08:49:43 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

17 answers

First of all there is no more a law of Biogenesis than there was a Law of Land Transportation before the Wright brothers.

And no one claims millions of DNA bases came together by chance. I was not there and neither were you. Many things are possible. It may be that the first life was a small RNA thread. It may be that even the first life begain as the result of an evolutionary process of sorts. All we really know for sure is that creationists like to make dishonest strawman arguments about what may have happened.

2006-06-20 08:56:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

DNA is just a molecule not life. Life comes about when DNA starts to replicate. The first DNA strands were nowhere near as long as human DNA and far less complex. Early life forms probably used RNA to reproduce much like viruses do today. RNA is simpler than DNA and DNA still uses RNA to replicate itself. Before we start this argument we have to first define life. You probably have a different definition than others. If life is a cell capable of converting energy, those form in space from elements.

2006-06-20 08:53:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If you take what is believed to have made up the "oceans" on primitive Earth, add heat (lightning) RNA strands will form. This was "proven" (there is no such thing as fact in science, just 99.99% surety) with an experiment that still hasn't been shown to have been incorrectly made. Once you've got RNA, life can begin (some viruses are composed completely of RNA) After that, you just need some evolution to get DNA, billions more years, and here we are.

2006-06-20 08:58:25 · answer #3 · answered by Joe Shmoe 4 · 0 0

OK. first of all, everything was created in seven days. there was no gradual evolving, that stuff is just wrong. God created Humans on the sixth day, along with the land animals. and the world is only a few thousand years old, not billions. for more information, look up Genesis 1. evolution is not how the world came to be. think about it. if people say we came from, say microbes, then ask them, were did the microbes come from? things do not just "change" gradually. we are the same as we were when God first created us.

2006-06-20 08:59:58 · answer #4 · answered by lilbeamer1122 2 · 0 0

According to Philotic Theory, only a few organic molecules would have had to come together in such a way as to call an aiua and become alive. And the rest is history (by which I mean the mind-numbingly slow process of evolution).

2006-06-20 08:54:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It is possible. In 2002 scientists created the first labratory virus born of completely non-living material.

Considering the infinate nature of time and space, the possibility for DNA to form and become self replicating is equally infinate. The virus created in 2002 only represents mans ability to duplicate the process under controlled conditions.

-SD-

2006-06-20 09:09:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

http://www.thetrumpet.com/index.php?page=article&id=589

This guy makes alot of good points but his conclusion needs to be refined. He is, of course, correct in all of his observations about evolution being fraud. However, he moves from the observable into the non-observable when he attributes the adancement of evolution as a challenge to christianity as the work of satan. Likely he is correct, but how the hell can you prove that? You can't and it's a major weakness of his argument.

But, you most certainly CAN prove that their is an evil agenda behind the promotion of evolution done by a specific, traceable group of people.....marxists. Now, quite obviously, marxists are and always have been tools of satan.....the blood of hundreds of millions of innocent people and the incredible depravity of any place in the world where marxist thought holds sway is extremely GRIM testament to that fact. But barring sightings of a horned guy with a pitchfork egging on chinese troops in Darfur (the chinese are behind the genocide in Darfur, btw) that is not going to sway most people. And it doesn't have to. The behaviors involved here are obviously heinously evil and all someone has to do is expose them and remind people of history....over and over again if necessary. And then tie the proponents of evolution back to the groups that promote marxism. This is pretty easy to do since they aren't very good at convering their tracks. Many are completely insane and can't keep themselves from shouting hateful things and revealing to everyone what is going on (cough, cough, Howard Dean, cough, cough).

http://www.discoverthenetwork.com

2006-06-20 09:01:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Even the Bible does not say Adam was the first life form, Y'all need to look again. The Bible says other life was called into existence after the world was made. I'm a believer in the primordal soup theory, but if you want to believe the Bible, at least read it.

2006-06-20 09:08:20 · answer #8 · answered by nursesr4evr 7 · 0 0

The first life form came about when God created Adam. You can read all about ti in Genesis.

2006-06-20 08:55:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i believe in god so i would say god created the earth the moon the sky , after that he made man from dust of the earth,
out of man god made woman , when adam was a sleep he removed his rib and blew on it and woman was formed. science s ays earth evolved from a single cell thats just as good as me saying we were evolved from dust

2006-06-20 08:55:55 · answer #10 · answered by cluelesskat maria 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers