Well lets see, Creationists reject Geology: They claim the earth is 6000 years old. Creationists reject astronomy, they claim the universe is 6000 years old. They reject physics. They claim the sun stopped in the sky. They reject Biology (Evolution). They reject modern Medicine, They reject Zoology. They reject Mathematics.
Then they claim anyone who accepts science is a fool.
Then they wonder why intelligent people don't take them seriously.
2006-06-20 07:50:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Personally, I don't keep track of the viewpoint of "Creationist's". I do -- however -- Strongly believe in the Creator of the Universe. Actual Creation & Science coincide ... You may like to get a better idea of what I'm referring to:
Reconciling Science and Religion :
"Science and religion -- no longer seen as incompatible."
"The Daily Telegraph", London - May 26, 1999
http://www.watchtower.org/library/g/2002/6/8/article_01.htm
One of the things I do recall about Creationist's is that they claimed that the creative days were 24 literal days, which the Bible does not actually indicate. This is dealt with in more detail in the above article, along w/ several other things.
"Make Sure of All things
... Hold Fast to what is Fine!"
...... 1 Thessalonians 5:21
2006-06-20 14:48:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not. No, I believe that a man really did walk on the moon. I am a "Creationist", I believe that God created the heavens and the earth, and all living creatures.
Actually, real science are things that can be observed and repeated. The Bible talks about "science-falsely-so-called." That is what the evolution theory is. It has never been proven and cannot be repeated. Look up the definition of science in an old school textbook.
2006-06-20 14:46:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jenny B 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, we Christians believe in real science. Evolution science is a science built upon a wild theory and gaps and incomplete data. Christian science is based upon laws of the universe. True science is based upon laws not theories.
To answer your moon question, the moon landing did happen in 1969, there is tons of proof, you have to be a closed minded individual to believe otherwise.
Your question is very closed minded and ignorant as well. Why do you think that way about people? Do you honestly think that we are retarded.
Have some RESPECT man!
2006-06-20 14:46:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mr. Agappae 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Every scientist actually seeking the truth and not just something to back up their whacked-out theory of evolution will find proof of creation. Every scientist seeking the truth will find proof that God exists. Every scientist seeking the missing link will find nothing. Every single time they think they've found the missing link it was a fake! Research it if you don't believe me.
And, no, these aren't the same people who disbelieve in the moon landing. They're the people who don't believe they've evolved from monkeys (which is much harder to believe than the moon landing!)
2006-06-20 14:52:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by justwonderin' 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, Creationist do not reject all science. As a matter of fact, creationists embrace science to prove their points as well. The only difference is the perspective from which you approach the data.
I recommend looking at http://www.answersingenesis.org They have a number of PHD scientists on their staff and have many good and interesting articles on every branch of science I can think of.
2006-06-20 14:41:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by bobm709 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, creationists don't reject science at all. In fact, they use science in an effort to support creationism.
It's also important to note that a lot of great scientific minds thought they were uncovering God's creation, like Einstein, Mendel, Newton and Kepler. I'm sure they didn't reject science.
2006-06-20 14:39:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by JG 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course not. We acknowledge PROVEN Science. Evolution is still 100% guess work. The only thing absolute is in the minds of those who brag because a Federal Judge (who knows very little about science) declared it factual.
Unless that Judge was around at the dawn of time to spell it all out - I'm just not taking his word for it. His authority is limited to judging matters of men, not the origins of the universe.
2006-06-20 14:40:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Victor ious 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
My belief in God has nothing to do with my degree in general sciences. However, I was taught alot of things in school that do not hold up under any true scientific test.
The science community as a whole has been trying to reject God for so long, they are now blinded to any kind of evidence to the contrary.
2006-06-20 14:45:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by cowboymanhrsetrnr 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Earth is flat, And 2 ppl can have sex like rabits and in no time create population that will cover this planet.
They count 1+1+1=3 , they have thier own math would in the world they would need science?
Therefore GOD exists.
2006-06-20 14:36:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by PicassoInActions 3
·
0⤊
0⤋