English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is for people who take the KJV or some other version literal, so if your opinion or believe is that God might have started evolution, this question really isn't for you.

Do you think that the evidence for evolution is all fake, or you just aren't convinced?

Do you think that slavery is ok, and when people ask about slavery in the bible that they are just wrong cause God is right?

What about people who think its impossible for a dead body to come back to life?

What do you think about people who are saying that the words have changed from the oldest copy to your King James version, and that the differences change the meaning from what God might have intended.

This is for people who take the KJV or some other version literal, so if your opinion or believe is that God might have started evolution, this question really isn't for you.

2006-06-20 06:14:19 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

10 answers

Aint no talking to those people. I've tried.

2006-06-20 06:18:08 · answer #1 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 1 0

I prefer the New American Standard Version. However, The NASV(which was translated with closer attention to the original language) differs only in structure of the KJV, not substance.
The NASV only makes a more definitive translation than the KJV.
On the slavery issue, time and place dictates that issue. Most people were not physically forced into slavery in Hebrew culture, the need was normally financial. More of an indenture than slavery.
every seven years, slaves were offered their freedom, many chose to stay"slaves by choice" otherwise known as a "Bond Servant" This was a lifetime decision.

2006-06-20 06:27:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Is the King James Version an Accurate version and untampered with by King James? YES
Here is the Proof:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Version_of_the_Bible
http://www.av1611.org/kjv/kjvhist.html

What about Slavery
Read this:
http://www.christian-thinktank.com/qnoslave.html

Impossible to bring a dead person back.
Think CPR..Think Jesus...Think God can do anything!

Translation problems?
This should clear up the confusion once and for all:
http://www.bible-researcher.com/canon.html

2006-06-20 06:45:49 · answer #3 · answered by williamzo 5 · 0 0

I know the KJV Bible is Gods infallible Word.
Because I know its author and he can't lie.
The KJV Bible has been burned,banned and
attacked from the day it came into existence.
The atheist Voltaire said he would stomp out
the KJV in his lifetime and now there is a Bible store where he said it from.
There has been multitudes and multitudes of
vile wretched people including myself had their lives turned around and lived lives that would
Glorify God.There has been organizations that
love God and their fellow man no matter how low they have sunk in depravity to lend a Loving
hand to them and lead them to real life in Jesus.
Like my Brother in Christ my pastor said "The Proof Is In The Pudding" CHANGED LIVES!!
Hallelujah what a SAVIOR!!
In Christ in Love,
TJ57

2006-06-20 08:44:46 · answer #4 · answered by TJ 57 4 · 0 0

nicely you could study new testomony Age Greek i assume. in any different case get a variety of of sturdy translations. they could't translate observe for observe with the aid of fact Greek sentence shape is distinctive, idioms used are distinctive etc, additionally words have somewhat distinctive meanings with the comparable observe. additionally no longer all words map precisely to English words. The translators do their maximum suitable. The meaning is fantastically lots the comparable i think of. Get a Catholic reported bible and a Protestant reported one in case you like - theres no longer lots difference truly. on the beginning up of each and every it is going to often supply a reason at the back of that distinctive version interior the creation. Eg New worldwide version (1973) - they needed a clean version in extra cutting-edge English, as variations at the same time with Revised wide-spread sound somewhat victorian in language use. you could examine up pertaining to to the onerous procedures they underwent to attempt and circumvent bias and mistake. words basically positioned throughout the time of meaning. whether translators are translating Plato into English, beginning of the Species into Arabic, or the Bible into English they do a expert pastime. Translations of the Bible are extra serious efforts with a great team of translators etc to do the pastime nicely. We Europeans and individuals are truly sturdy at it. (We, no longer the middle Easterners, labored out hieroglyphs, cuneiform, linear B - we are warm technically.)

2016-10-31 04:42:21 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It does not matter which translation of the bible one uses it is written:
Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God
Joh 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth

Jesus is the WORD. The bible is the words of the WORD. ;-)

2006-06-20 06:25:47 · answer #6 · answered by Lady Di-USA 4 · 0 0

God, Missiah, Imanual, Bright and Morning Star, the Father, the Son, Jesus Christ, Holy Ghost, King of king, Lord of lords, The beginning and the end.

All are still ONE God ...

2006-06-20 06:56:59 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

a Lamb who was SLAIN can realistically be explained by the avatar photo of the man they call larri.

lamb=larrib

lamb=lamp

p=a DI stitched together
b=a DI stitched together

SIL A I IV.

thus the words practically explain themselves.

2006-06-20 06:22:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's a horrible translation

2006-06-20 06:17:24 · answer #9 · answered by Black Fedora 6 · 0 0

do we really need another argument? is that all people on this thing like to do? go get yourself a bowl of raisen bran.

2006-06-20 06:44:49 · answer #10 · answered by Stuie 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers