2006-06-20 05:11:29 · 7 answers · asked by Hoolahoop 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
yes
2006-06-20 05:22:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The United States has always considered a nuclear bomb an absolute last resort after the 2 Atomic Bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of WWII.
Most countries, with the exception of Iran and North Korea, have nuclear weapons as a preventative measure rather than an offensive measure.
Point is: it would take a lot to make the United States use a nuke, it wouldn't take all that much for Iran or North Korea to.
2006-06-20 12:20:17 · answer #2 · answered by steveb106 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have the power yet we don't use it. These other countries will and there is a good chance we would feel the effects of allowing them to build nuclear weapons
2006-06-20 12:36:31 · answer #3 · answered by Joseph 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While its true we lost the moral high ground after Hiroshima/Nagasak, indeed even after Dresden, but we have tried to recover for the sake of global security. What the alternative? Can you imagine nukes being controlled by rogue states, rogue leaders and martyrs?
2006-06-20 12:33:56 · answer #4 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because might is right and if they don't do what we say we will blown them up. We are a stable country unlike Iran and North Korea, we are ruled by laws not men so we won't bomb someone just because we don't like them.
2006-06-20 12:16:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No it is not. Unlike America and Israel, Iran wants the weapon to obliretate Israel and the west. I urge you to think clearly and give up moral relativism. It's a bad disease.
2006-06-20 12:14:40 · answer #6 · answered by scorpion 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's like the age old theory....What came 1st, the chicken or the egg?.....
2006-06-20 12:16:48 · answer #7 · answered by Chris B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋