We're not at war with Iraq. We are helping the democratically elected Iraq government fight the terrorist insurgents and the foreign terrorist invaders (from Iran and Syria).
I don't want to sound harsh, but do you have the slightest clue as to what is going on at all?
2006-06-20 00:44:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
We're not at war with Iraq, we're at war with terrorists. The United States (after the Manhatten Project, which wasn't only the U.S. by the way as people fail to acknowledge) will only use Nuclear weapons as a last resort. We have nuclear weapons for defense, not offense. We're not stupid enough to nuke Iraq. 1. We know how bad the fallout would be and the world would be a lot worse off. 2. We're trying to get stability in Iraq and make it so Iraq can start supporting itself and rebuild, why would we nuke it? 3. Nuking it wouldn't solve the problem. Terrorists are everywhere, not just in Iraq. 4. We have too many of our troops there that would be killed. Although a lot have died, there are a lot more left and to nuke Iraq and kill them all would be one of the stupidest things we have ever done.
Annnd to people who keep saying "Pull out of Iraq, the war is bad, blah blah blah." We can't pullout until we finish what we started. Iraq has their new government in place, but they're hardly ready to be a stable country and start to rebuild themselves. If we left, the Iraqi government would be overthrown by Al-Qaeda and we'd be back where we started.
Over the years with all of the people telling us to just up and leave Iraq right now because our people are dying, we've been given reasons why not. The biggest of which is that if we leave, it proves to the terrorists that their methods of intimidation, scare-tactics, murderings, beheadings, bombings, and more are working and they will try to do what they did with Spain and bomb something or do another thing along those lines so the country will put a less anti-terrorist government in power.
2006-06-22 23:53:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Andee 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO! If the United States were to drop a nuclear bomb on Iraq, there might just be a revolution. So many people are already against the war. Just thinking about the repercussions of dropping a bomb makes me shudder. For one thing, the "purpose" of the mission is Iraqi freedom and democracy, right? If we just blast them all, how are we making the world a better, more democratic place?
2006-06-20 01:47:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by starcent 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, the only reason the military and the president have not done so is because dropping a bomb on Iraq, it will explode in the USA!
Further, we were not invited to Iraq! Some 40 years ago we placed a dictator there. Then, with the excuse of democracy we bombard the country and take our boy to the USA safety. Since the governors do not care for us, do we have to hate, kill, exterminate the poor people who have already suffer from our interference to their country for more than 50 years?
In order to keep their land, we should place an army of our people and some other stupid states who are afraid to act!
2006-06-20 00:48:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by soubassakis 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Um, I take it you have never been to Iraq or even in the military? We already defeated Iraq. They surrendered. All hostilities have ceased. Didn't you hear Bush say that on the carrier? We are no longer at war with Iraq. We are at war with the insurgents, that are attacking Iraqi women, children, and old people. The insugents are cowards, that for the most part attack innocent people. The insurgents are nthing more tham women that have a penis. The insugents are not only Iraqi, but are from all over the world, trying to fight a 'holy war' for their bramd of Islam. The insurgents will not stop becaus of a nuclear bomb. The insugents we are fighting against are located throughout the world, including the USA. Should we bomb our own cities now?
2016-05-20 04:26:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No! Iraq did NOT attack the USA. We invaded a sovereign nation for no just cause, other than George Bush wanted to get even with Saddam for humiliating his daddy during Desert Storm and Dick Cheney wants all the oil that's swimming under Iraqi sands.
We are engaged in an illegal, unconstitutional war that has already killed tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis, and 2,500 U.S. soldiers. George Bush has already massacred enough. It's time for the USA to stop bullying other countries.
Dropping the bom on Japan was different: we were attacked and had to defend ourselves. It was the one way to end the war. Iraq is entirely different; we have no business being there in the first place.
2006-06-20 00:45:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
We should not drop a nuclear bomb on anyone. Idle talk expressing hostility like this just makes things worse.
2006-06-20 00:55:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by cats_waves 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
nuclear war is a last recourse regardless of what some pep think were still the most powerful army in the world nuclear war should never be started especialy against the likes of al quida. the pep of iraq do not deserve this you idiot
2006-06-20 03:41:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
YOur Quesiton is a proof that Americans are terrriosts and invaders, and they have no support in Iraq, they are fighting with citizens in Iraq. I also can understand that American nation has no moral or ethical values, America is country of Crazy people, who they don't even know the meaning of respect, more then half of you are bastered as your former president Clintin said not my Idea. In the end May God (Allah) bless you all.
2006-06-20 00:46:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by bashar 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
i on the other hand was sorta thinking you take your f****ing troops out of Iraq so they wont have to die any more! the invasion itself was made only to get Iraq's energy resources! Does your mother have more children who think like yoy? Cause if she does the world is not a safe place!
2006-06-20 00:45:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by metafrastria 4
·
0⤊
1⤋