This past weekend's US Open provided several surprises and, for the most part, I did enjoy the tournament. Unlike some, I was not surprised that Tiger Woods missed the cut for the first time at a major (as a professional). I think it was unrealistic to expect him to perform up to his usual excellent standard after having not played in a tournament in nine weeks. Factor in the loss of his father, with whom he was extremely close, the inherent difficulties of a US Open course setup and the fact it was played at Winged Foot (perhaps the single most difficult venue for the Open), and it was a recipe for failure. No worries. He'll be back.
As for the dramatic events at the conclusion of the Open on Sunday, I felt worst for the much-maligned Colin Montgomery of Scotland who but for one poorly played shot at the worst possible moment (his approach shot on the 18th hole) would have finally won his first major at the age of 43. Although I also felt bad for Phil Mickelson, he at least has three majors now and, more importantly, he basically threw away his chance to win on Sunday. Phil resorted to his bad old, ramblin', gamblin' ways and deservedly lost because of it, double-bogeying the final hole.
The bottom line is that the talented young Aussie, Geoff Ogilvy, was a deserving champion and is an excellent golfer in his own right (not a fluke, trust me). He did what was necessary to remain in contention and win the tournament. The fact that others blew their chances is hardly a reflection on his own play. Well done!
2006-06-21 09:55:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by MacSteed 7
·
22⤊
11⤋
Yes it was! Not just a surprise but a shocker as well. First, Tiger missed the cut. But this was understandable. Then, Phil who was touted to capture the title mishandled his chances. It was a sorry loss. Overconfident? And alas, an Aussie surprised everybody holding the trophy in the end. The scores were terrible. Personally, it wasnt enjoyable seeing lots of golfers looking stupid by commiting lots of boboos due to course' difficulty. I would say it was more enjoyable watching the Masters. :-D
2006-06-20 10:43:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by cernad06 3
·
1⤊
4⤋
No... It's been like this during the past many years. Remember Payne Stewart put turned 360 degree back..during his US open won year over Phil, too. Disappointed though, and the broadcaster was trying to justify the course by saying that this happened many times in the past that top players are coming in with lots of black figures, especially in winged foot!
2006-06-20 11:09:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Titan 7
·
1⤊
4⤋