~The US is clearly involved in an illegal invasion of a sovereign state, but to call such a trivial skirmish a holocost is ludicrous.
2006-06-19 20:54:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Oscar Himpflewitz 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Slavery existed in every European country at one point, and even existed in countries that they were taken from. A lot of people don't realize that many of the slaves' home country fostered slavery within their own borders. Not saying it was right, but it was an act condoned by many races throughout history - in case you were implying this is a white-black issue.
As for the US Army...you are naive to think that the Army is directly responsible for most of the casualties. It's obvious that the insurgents are killing innocent civilians - men, women, and children in much higher numbers.
2006-06-19 19:59:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by SirCharles 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Shame on you for calling that damn war in Iraq the 2nd holocost.
The war in Iraq is far from being called the second holocost. If your going to call that the second holocost then what are you going to call whats happening at Darfur?
2006-06-19 20:00:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont know if there was a first one,
but whats hapening in Iraq is a big massacres by the us army,but the problem is that ppl dont want to admit it,they r so blind that they do beleive what the zionist controled media tells them that its all hapening by mistake!!!
I dont understand how an advanced army can kill all these inocent ppl by mistake!!!???
2006-06-19 22:11:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your insurgents are killing civilians daily not American soldiers.The whole country could easily have been totally removed by our military had we wanted it so.We didn't even have forced military service,all we have there are volunteers.We are barely even putting any real forces there.It is only the swatting of flies.We don't need the oil there we didn't buy it from there before,there are many places to get oil.
2006-06-19 23:29:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its sad that you believe it. If your beliefs we're true we'd be taking oil and have lower gasoline prices, but guess what your beliefs are false. We pay for the oil - so how goes your argument again? How is it we're there for black gold when we pay a fair market value for the product?
I wonder how long you'd last under an al queda regime?
2006-06-19 20:00:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by netjr 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
if the nazis were found guilty of genocide then i do believe that war waged against iraq is considered a holocaust...... to point out clearly holocaust - is a massive destruction of humans by other humans.........get the pictur? too many women n children have died, every single day people die shedding blood in the street what an awful image.......if the u.s really want to stop terrorism then stop terrorizing other country!
2006-06-19 21:10:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by peace 2 all 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
What is happening in Iraq is not a holocaust. What happened in Bosnia-Herzegovina was a holocaust.
The U.S. Army has not killed 20,000 people. The Iraqi insurgency has.
2006-06-19 19:58:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This would be the 3rd holocaust. First one was slavery that no one seems to mention because it was universally adopted and accepted. It lasted for thousands of years and killed millions of innocent people.
2006-06-19 19:50:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sergio 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
10,000 - 70,000 people?? is this the metric equivelant???
more civilians are being killed by "insurgents" than US military.
2006-06-20 02:27:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by jordanjd4 5
·
0⤊
0⤋