2006-06-19 18:23:06 · 6 answers · asked by Kenny ♣ 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It is 100 percent right :o).
http://www.creationevidence.org/
2006-06-19 18:26:49 · answer #1 · answered by kissmymindagain 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
"Intelligent design" says that complexity = must have been designed. The problem is there are plenty of complicated things that have clearly evolved. The English language is very complicated, but it wasn't invented on a Tuesday night by a clever person. It has evolved and adapted, and is still doing so. The modern bicyle wasn't created out of nothing by an intelligent designer. It has been through a process of adaptation, improvement. The modern telephone is the result of a long process going from primitive to sophisticated. Even in things that man makes and designs, there is a process of evolution! The survival of the viable.
Intelligent design claims to refute evolution, but it can never manage this, because even designed things evolve.
2006-06-20 00:32:45 · answer #2 · answered by mary_sconster 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ID doesn't really explain anything about WHAT happened. It says God created man, but HOW? By what actual physical method? Science says that He used evolution to do it, and no one is giving a better explanation (or ANY other explanation) of exactly how He did it.
2006-06-19 18:37:00 · answer #3 · answered by rg7890v 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It isn't at all correct; it conflicts with theories and laws that are actually scientific, are backed by an enormous amount of evidence, are written about in peer-reviewed journals, etc.
2006-06-19 18:34:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That leaves a bad problem.
whats the other 1/2?
Eph. Christ is ONE BODY. not a 1/2 a body. :)
Bummerrrrrrrrr
2006-06-19 18:30:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. Can't prove or disprove the untestable.
2006-06-19 18:26:54 · answer #6 · answered by Petrarchan Motif 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋