more stupid left wing questions to come
2006-06-19 14:32:16 · 22 answers · asked by Ghost of War 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I love it! I like the way you think. People above - read the statement below the question:
more stupid left wing questions to come
2006-06-19 14:53:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The way Hitler could manipulate people, he was a mental weapon of mass destruction to the world...but a mental and physical weapon of mass destruction to the poor Jews and anyone who were associated with them. I also think that the whole "Hitler era" is occuring now, just with more excuses and different psychopaths.
2006-06-19 15:07:27 · answer #2 · answered by Joyce G 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Weapons of mass destruction are not always in the form of Biological,Nuclear and Chemical Weapon.
Above that the most dangerous weapons of mass destruction is the Fanatic Dangerous Ideology,like what NAZI and the Al-Qaeda has.
2006-06-19 15:37:58 · answer #3 · answered by Eldha'sfather 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Firstly, Hitler was actively developing nuclear fusion weapons by way of heavy water research. Secondly, the Gestapo had, in fact, actively field-tested Sarin ( a nerve agent ) for Hitler, about a week prior to the invasion of Poland. Our best guess as to why he refused to use it on the Allies ( since we certainly had no defense for it ) is that he believed that since Germany had developed it, the Allies must certainly also have it, and because he had himself survived a mustard gas attack at Verdun in WWI.
2006-06-19 17:48:47 · answer #4 · answered by spyguy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we didn't fight Hitler you would today be pledging allegiance and guilt to a Dictator.
Do you not know that when the Rome, Berlin, Tokyo Axis was formed a plan was in place that The Axis would rule the World and they designated what Rome, Berlin and Tokyo would each get in the entire world.
Hitler vowed his Empire would last 1000 years.
2006-06-19 15:01:39 · answer #5 · answered by MrCool1978 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hiter WAS the weapon of mass destruction. He massacred millions of innocent Jews, and he invaded many countries in Europe. That's why we fought him. He also attacked many American citizens who were travelling across the Atlantic.
2006-06-19 14:37:03 · answer #6 · answered by bloake 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh come on....... geez
I'm not going to waste my time educating you on historical facts. You could find the answer to this question in about 5 minutes with a few searches of WWII.
Just come out and ask what you really meant to ask... that way you don't embarrass yourself.
2006-06-19 14:38:19 · answer #7 · answered by Answers R Me 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The interventionist distant places coverage has been pursued by making use of the two events, and it truly is been a failure basically approximately every time. Killing people basically seems to piss off their family contributors and associates. with a bit of luck, those working the worldwide conflict on Terror(tm) have observed this..
2016-10-31 03:55:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
FDR wanted the hair oil and the bratwursts.
No war for sausages!
Keep your posts coming because some people are getting wound up and actually answering them!!
2006-06-19 17:47:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was an evil dictator who wanted the whole world to be one type and did MANY evil things. We were helping the country trying to get him away. Can't really put in better words.
2006-06-19 14:37:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋