I think the Roman Catholic Church is making a mistake by insisting on celibacy for priests, but they don't answer to me.
2006-06-19 11:04:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
This idea came from the Jews, John the Baptist, Jesus, and the Apostle Paul.
The Jews. The Talmud argues that a person whose “soul is bound up with the Torah and is constantly occupied with it” may remain celibate (Maimonides, Laws of Marriage 15.3). This argument could certainly have been based on the biblical example of Jeremiah, a celibate prophet who was ordered by Yahweh not to marry (Jeremiah 16:1-4). Moreover, the Essenes was a group that was active in Jesus’ time that practiced celibacy and thought by most scholars to be the authors of the Dead Sea Scrolls.
John the Baptist and Jesus are both believed to have been celibate for their entire lives. Some scholars believe that either or both Jesus and John the Baptist were influenced in their celibacy by the example of the Essenes.
The Apostle Paul is explicit about his celibacy (see 1 Cor. 7). There is also evidence in the gospel of Matthew for the practice of celibacy among at least some early Christians, in the famous passage about becoming “eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 19:12).
The concept took many twists and turns over the years and will probably take a few more before Christ returns in glory.
With love in Christ.
2006-06-19 17:25:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by imacatholic2 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a way of them showing their devotion to their beliefs. It also comes from the fact that for their service, they are given property to live in. So we'll take a hypothetical.
A catholic priest is allowed to marry, and does so. They live in a house owned by the church. The priest dies. Who gets the house? Where does the widowed wife go?
It just cuts out a lot of issues that can arise from it too.
2006-06-19 11:04:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Their are two general reasons for priests abstaining from marriage.
The first reason is argued in the Bible that Jesus never married, since there is no proof he was. Therefore people in holy orders should not be wed to follow the life of christ and to devote their lives to the church.
The second reason in more practical. Eliminating marriage prevents bloodline inheritence in the church, therefore it would make it very difficult for one family to continue ruling as a pope, bishop, line of priests etc. This would prevent a family from inheriting church property.
2006-06-19 11:14:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Catholic Clergy take an oath of celibacy. No sex. They are also forbidden to get married. Per Church doctrine.
2006-06-19 11:05:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Blond Logic 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In addition: Apostles' Creed A components containing briefly statements, or "articles," the primary tenets of Christian perception, and having for its authors, in line with culture, the Twelve Apostles. Based at the God the Holy Trinity, to baptize within the identify of The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit. Origin of the creed Throughout the Middle Ages it was once probably believed that the Apostles, at the day of Pentecost, at the same time nonetheless beneath the direct concept of the Holy Ghost, composed our gift Creed among them, each and every of the Apostles contributing probably the most twelve articles. This legend dates again to the 6th century (see Pseudo-Augustine in Migne, P.L., XXXIX, 2189, and Pirminius, ibid., LXXXIX, 1034), and it's foreshadowed nonetheless prior in a sermon attributed to St. Ambrose (Migne, P.L., XVII, 671; Kattenbusch, I, eighty one), which takes become aware of that the Creed was once "pieced in combination by way of twelve separate workmen". About the identical date (c. four hundred) Rufinus (Migne, P.L., XXI, 337) offers a particular account of the composition of the Creed, which account he professes to have acquired from prior a long time. Although he does now not explicitly assign each and every article to the authorship of a separate Apostle, he states that it was once the joint paintings of all, and means that the deliberation took location at the day of Pentecost. Moreover, he broadcasts that "they for lots of simply motives determined that this rule of religion must be referred to as the Symbol", which Greek phrase he explains to intend each indicium, i.e. a token or password through which Christians could admire each and every different, and collatio, that's to mention an delivering made from separate contributions. A few years earlier than this (c. 390), the letter addressed to Pope Siricius by way of the Council of Milan (Migne, P.L., XVI, 1213) provides the earliest recognized example of the mixture Symbolum Apostolorum ("Creed of the Apostles") in those hanging phrases: "If you credit score now not the lessons of the monks . . . allow credit score a minimum of take delivery of to the Symbol of the Apostles which the Roman Church continually preserves and continues inviolate." The phrase Symbolum on this experience, status by myself, meets us first approximately the core of the 3rd century within the correspondence of St. Cyprian and St. Firmilia, the latter in specified talking of the Creed because the "Symbol of the Trinity", and spotting it as an quintessential facet of the ceremony of baptism (Migne, P.L., III, 1165, 1143). It must be further, in addition, that Kattenbusch (II, p. eighty, be aware) believes that the identical use of the phrases may also be traced way back to Tertullian. Still, within the first 2 centuries after Christ, even though we quite often uncover point out of the Creed beneath different designations (e.g. regula fidei, doctrina, traditio), the identify symbolum does now not arise. Rufinus was once as a consequence mistaken while he declared that the Apostles themselves had "for lots of simply motives" decided on this very time period. This truth, joined with the intrinsic improbability of the tale, and the unexpected silence of the New Testament and of the Ante-Nicene Fathers, leaves us no option however to treat the circumstantial narrative of Rufinus as unhistorical. and so forth... Conclusion: The catholic/common church is referred to as One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. In one thousand, the orthodox church splits from the catholic. Until now, each catholic and orthodox church also known as themselves the OHCAC. YES, the catholic church was once biblically instituted at approximately 33 AD on the pentecost. How wonderful it's...
2016-08-28 10:08:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by lostetter 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, we must protest the Catholic Church for having gay priests and for not letting their priests get any action!
They art heathen beasts!
Hissss!
2006-06-19 11:06:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lil OL REBORN 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They dont marry because they are married to God and the church.Thus taking the vow of chasity to allow them to better focus on their churches needs.
2006-06-19 11:04:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by metrogurl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
because the church thinks that the priest cannot fully serve his congregational and his familial duties, One would suffer, and its not fair to either.
2006-06-19 11:04:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was forbidden to them in 1050 AD.
2006-06-19 11:03:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋