2006-06-19 10:13:15 · 10 answers · asked by lowonbrain 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
They are both equal depending on your approach and comprehension. Scientifically, every thing is based on cause and effect, thus matter is not eternal nor perfect b/c it must have a beginning. If it was perfect/eternal, then it would not change but it does. Thus an Originator is required into the equation of existence. I just added this 2nd part b/c I thought it may be interesting for you.
2006-06-19 10:19:29 · answer #1 · answered by Ismael B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The notion of God, although its easier for a child to believe, not as one grows up...bcos if we reason then there are many explainations against God, except for the fact that we r alive n we die, n the ques. abt what happens to us whn we die, or how the world came to be, n if there was a big-bang, what made that happen, its so vague and not easy to comprehend at all.
2006-06-19 17:18:42 · answer #2 · answered by natasha 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably it is more difficult to believe in something you can't tangibly experience than to comprehend the definition of a point.
2006-06-19 17:16:06 · answer #3 · answered by nanawnuts 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm gonna pull out the both answer on this one, but really I can define a point, God on the other had is either undefinable or has to many definitions.
2006-06-19 17:35:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
By 'point' I presume you mean the point of infinite density from which the universe came into being. Yes, this theory has far more credence than the man-made God that was created only a relatively short time ago.
2006-06-19 17:18:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
God is incomprehendable since (supposedly) he is so powerful we can't understand Him. Which is a fancy way of saying "we don't want to answer questions that arise from all the 'evil' things God does, so we'll say we just can't understand Him"
2006-06-19 17:21:46 · answer #6 · answered by Joe Shmoe 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course the notion of "God" is more difficult to believe because if it wasn't we wouldn't need faith.
2006-06-19 17:38:21 · answer #7 · answered by christina m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither is hard to comprehend. But people don't agree with you won't concede to your point.
2006-06-19 17:15:36 · answer #8 · answered by korngoddess1027 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God cannot be defined because he's so beyond our understanding, AND he loves us - how cool is that?
2006-06-19 17:21:11 · answer #9 · answered by trace 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both have their pitfalls to understanding.
2006-06-19 17:18:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋