2006-06-19 06:43:48 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Saddam had them shipped through Syria to be buried in the Bekaa Valley in the hope that his regime would survive the invasion...
http://www.freespeech.com/archives/002668.html
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38581
http://www.aina.org/news/2006012695410.htm
Update: WMD's were found in Iraq this week:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060622/wl_afp/uscongressiraqweaponschemical_060622103838
2006-06-19 08:40:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Bush used that as a ruse so he could justify attacking a sovereign nation that did not attack us.
Why should Iraq - or any other country - not be allowed to have weapons of mass destruction when the United States has more than the rest of the world combined? Because the U.S. believes it should be the 'bully' nation that maintains its power by minimizing everyone else's. All's fair in love and war, and that means any other country should be allowed to have weapons to defend itself with in the event of an American attack.
Go to www.blogger.com and find the newest "blog book" - BUSHWACKER!
Bush lied to the American people. Iraq never had any weapons of mass destruction. Bush wanted to "get even" with Saddam for humiliating his daddy during Desert Storm. Cheney wanted to get his swarmy hands on all the oil swimming under Iraq's sands. Those are the only two reasons Bush started this illegal, unconstitutional war. Our troops will not pull out of Iraq until we have all of that country's oil locked up. Wait and see.....
2006-06-19 06:51:14 · answer #2 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not even close to being the latest but I'm too lazy to dig those up. Updated evidence includes a mountain of translated documents from Hussein's government detailing the WMD and their move to Syria by the Soviets. They also document a nuclear program invovling yellow cake uranium from africa (cough). Further, there testimony by the people from Husseins government involved in the move. This raises extremely disturbing questions about the russians.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/3/2/230625.shtml
2006-06-19 06:49:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Okay here's the deal. They didn't technically have weapons of mass destruction. They had everything to make it though. It would be like me taking apart a gun and putting the parts in different rooms of my house. Technically, I don't have a gun.
2006-06-19 06:49:29 · answer #4 · answered by proud_usmc_wife04 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with Ben.
Syria.
And in fact I bet that part of the reason why Iran is raising all this hell is to distract us from whatever they're brewing right now in places like Syria.
We should have never warned Sadam, we shoulda just showed up without warning probably 6 months before we did. They would have found all the WMDs. We gave them time to sneak them out. We are stupid.
2006-06-19 06:49:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Read this: http://www.whidbey.us/blixreport03072003.asp
Hans Blix's Full Report...it will answer any questions you have about WMDs in Iraq before and during the "war"...
2006-06-19 07:02:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Syria
2006-06-19 06:45:33 · answer #7 · answered by ben s 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think their in China pointed at San Diego, Los Angeles, and New York.
2006-06-19 06:47:54 · answer #8 · answered by hexa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're three years late with the question.besides America being america,,they have already found another reason for the TERRORIST attack they commited on Iraq.
2006-06-19 06:49:19 · answer #9 · answered by jgmafb 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They don't have any weapons of mass destruction, that was just a ploy for Bush to **** Iraq in the *** while stillin' their oil-----Give me a break please!!!!!
2006-06-19 06:51:36 · answer #10 · answered by reggaeblackpanther 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋