Why is the world so intrigued with high tech wepons?

Question

SO for history 10 we have to write an short essay like thing on why the world is so intrested with them. and im not all that sure why. so like is it because they cause more damage and supposeobly solve the problem fast or somthing. so it would be nice if someone gave me some more ideas and such, it would bw great. thanks

Answer 1

Sure, faster, more accurate, more effective weapons will get the job done for efficiently, but that's not why we strive for more technological advances in warfare -- it's not like there's some quality assurance inspector behind the front line saying, "Now, General, my sources tell me that you are only averaging about fifteen kills per mortar shell, and that is simply not acceptable if you expect a promotion this year! You have a quota to meet, you know!"

It's an arms race out there, and has been ever since two cavemen showed up to a fight, one with a big rock and the other with a sharpened stick that he threw and killed his opponent from a distance. The next time, a fighter from the losing tribe brought his own sharpened stick, but by that time, the innovator brought a sling made of mammoth hide or something and killed his opponent from even further away with a stone. The next time, one of them showed up with his newest invention: the bow and arrow. Eventually, one of them thought to bring a shield with him. And so on, and so on and so on.

We continue to build better and better weapons because our opponents continue to build better weapons, armor and countermeasures to the weapons we already have. If someone hadn't invented cannons, we'd still wage war with rifles and bayonets and cavalry charges. If we hadn't decided to use airplanes in warfare, it would all be done over land, one muddy, bloody step at a time. Armor piercing bullets wouldn't be necessary if stronger, thicker steel plating wasn't placed on vehincles and if Kevlar wasn't in every flak jacket. It's not just because newer, shinier weapons are cool; they're necessary to give the side that has them a tactical and technological advantage on the battlefield.

Answer 2

That intrigue begun as early as the word INTIMIDATION was discovered. And that INTIMIDATION started when man saw the Lion roared loud and scared the Cat and all smaller living things on earth. Eventually, the lion became the most feared animal in his kingdom. And so with the HIGH TECH WEAPON. As technology advance further, weapons become more powerful, destructive and more precise. The more powerful it is, the more it is to be feared of and so with the country or any individual who owns it. As a country, you need these weapons to protect the nation's interest, to protect your people and territory. It deter any invaders.

The first of its kind was dropped by the US in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. It crippled Japan and led to the unconditional surrender of the seemingly impregnable Japanese Imperial Army in WWII. It ended the occupation Japan in the Philippines and other part of Asia. It was 60 year ago.

High Tech Weapons at present??? Can't imagine how advance and how destructive are these now.

The race and spread of high tech weapons still on the go. Same purpose as it was. For protection, self defense, intimidation, deterrence and everything. It will end when one day a mad man push those buttons for the universal suicide.

Answer 3

We does no longer be any smarter ( a minimum of in the absence of eugenics or genetic engineering). in the approach the board we would probable be dumber, as, in a sophisticated society wise, knowledgeable human beings have a tendency to have small households, at the same time as low foreheadmorons have many decedents. nevertheless the tremendous improve in numbers, at the same time as reducing our regularly occurring would improve the potential for an Einstein. There would probable were a lot less wars. at the same time as there have been wars that were in accordance to faith there have been far better that had economic and political motivations that used faith as an excuse and a recruiting device. very like the conflicts in the mid east now, faith has little to do with the aims of the leaders yet each thing to do with how they recruit cannon fodder. the authentic non secular wars will be a lot less, the wars the position faith replaced into used to deliver the sheep to the slaughter would merely get replaced by ability of yet an extra reason ( say commies v capitalists). we will be significantly better tech yet inspite of the actual undeniable truth that it took just about 2000 years for us to achieve the technological element we loved in the previous the Christians determined understanding issues replaced into evil, we does no longer be 2,000 years previous the position we are now. between the excuses tech, information, and regularly occurring enlightenment flow so quickly now is the fashion of human beings in contact. Our inhabitants is now say 8 to 10 cases what's replaced into again then and it takes a lot less peasants to provide the aspects for scientists. So we've not in reality ten cases the fashion of human beings, and ten cases the probable probability of manufacturing an Einstein, a Socrates, or a Buddah, we actually have 1000 cases the fashion of craftsman who would make incremental will improve, and scholars who, at the same time as no longer genius themselves, would act because the help team for our large minds. a much smaller percentage of the inhabitants that we do have are ignorant peasants and maximum of them will be quite observed by ability of their Palin pins. i imagine, that at the same time as it took just about 2000 years to achieve the position we were in the previous the christians got here alongside, we are although in reality a pair of hundred years in the back of the position we will be with out them. The style of significant minds is the element that strikes us ahead and we are in reality now drawing close the singularity.

Answer 4

Most people would rather launch a missle or drop a bomb down a chimney somewhere rather than actually attempt to solve a regional problem which takes looking at things from another's point of view, time, money, long term commitments...you get the idea. Sorry for the idealism....there! I feel better.

Answer 5

High Tech isn't always about making the biggest BOOM! The USA is going high tech for both strategic and moral reasons. Strategically, it's better if you can actually HIT the target you want to take out. In WW2 we would drop several hundred bomb to make sure we hit ONE building because the bombs weren't guided to their target (dumb bombs)! Today we use one bomb that is guided by laser or GPS (Global positioning System) to take out a building (Smart Bombs).

Morally, it's just not right to kill innocent people so we build guided bombs and missles so we don't kill those that aren't involved, or as few as possible.

I hope this helps

Answer 6

It is like buying a car, you want the best you can afford.
If you can knock out the target without risking your peoples lives thats good.
also you have far fewer unentended damage or casualties

Answer 7

i dont know why the world is so interested in it, probably because its just cool to know how the military does it.

the military is interested in it because it helps kill the enemy w/o civilian casualties. it also kills more enemy with less bombs. since war situation can vary hugely, you need a variety of weapons to use in these scenarios.

Answer 8

"Huge Question", Well friend, High tech weapontry is the quik solution to end hostility ( right over might ). It's punishment and not murder.

Answer 9

If they make a new accurate weapon everyone wants it to portect them selves from the other. Everybody wants the best.

Answer 10

well nukes have prevented major wars for about 70 years