English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The UN did not even find trace amounts of the chemicals necessary to create these weapons when they conducted a thorough investigation in Iraq. And plenty of clear photograpic evidence is available clearly proving that a passenger jet had not hit the Pentagon.

My questions are these:

On what basis do the fundamental Christians base their support of their Born-Again Commander-in Chief? Is it purely that his agenda coinides with yours? Can you trust a man whose lies have cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of innocents? How does true Christianity figure into Bush's bigger plan

2006-06-19 05:51:31 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I will try to find that website which showed numerous photos and videos of the Pentagon after the explosion. Really no evidence of a passenger plane hitting it. the video released a short video which showed a quick streak of light which was supposed to represent a passenger jet traveling 2 feet above the ground at over 500 miles an hour. I agree that something hit the pentagon, but there is no evidence even suggesting such a large vessel.

About the families of the victims? Wouldn't they want to be sure of the truth?? Especially if it was a government conspiracy, what really happened to them?

2006-06-19 06:51:47 · update #1

I will try to find that website which showed numerous photos and videos of the Pentagon after the explosion. Really no evidence of a passenger plane hitting it. the video released a short video which showed a quick streak of light which was supposed to represent a passenger jet traveling 2 feet above the ground at over 500 miles an hour. I agree that something hit the pentagon, but there is no evidence even suggesting such a large vessel.

About the families of the victims? Wouldn't they want to be sure of the truth?? Especially if it was a government conspiracy, what really happened to them?

2006-06-19 06:51:52 · update #2

No, I was witness to their demise and lost family there. I want to know the truth. Who really is complicit in this attack?

Once the facts are out there, whatever they are, my relatives and the relatives of so many others will rest easy.

2006-06-19 06:56:26 · update #3

19 answers

I believe that the families of the people who died in that plane crash would be very offended by your comment.

2006-06-19 05:55:26 · answer #1 · answered by Paul McDonald 6 · 0 0

The official story on Iraq has never made sense. The connection that the Bush administration has tried to draw between Iraq and al-Qaida has always seemed contrived and artificial. In fact, it was hard to believe that smart people in the Bush administration would start a major war based on such flimsy evidence. The pieces just didn't fit. Something else had to be going on; something was missing. In recent days, those missing pieces have finally begun to fall into place. As it turns out, this is not really about Iraq. It is not about weapons of mass destruction, or terrorism, or Saddam, or U.N. resolutions. This war, should it come, is intended to mark the official emergence of the United States as a full-fledged global empire, seizing sole responsibility and authority as planetary policeman. It would be the culmination of a plan 10 years or more in the making, carried out by those who believe the United States must seize the opportunity for global domination, even if it means becoming the "American imperialists" that our enemies always claimed we were. Once that is understood, other mysteries solve themselves. For example, why does the administration seem unconcerned about an exit strategy from Iraq once Saddam is toppled? Because we won't be leaving. Having conquered Iraq, the United States will create permanent military bases in that country from which to dominate the Middle East, including neighboring Iran.
This Is The Real Goal Of USA In Iraq.

2006-06-19 12:57:57 · answer #2 · answered by Biomimetik 4 · 0 0

#1. You gave no evidence for your No Passenger plane or strike on the Pentagon. Its easy to dream up something - now prove it.
#2. I'm still waiting for your claim that the World Trade Center is still in tact.
#3. I'm a Christian and never claimed Bush was born again. No Born Again Christian would force Israel to give up its God given land - and yet Bush claims God told him to set up a Two State solution.
#4. Those weapons of mass destruction were moved from Iraq under cover of the Russian Ambassadorial Convoy that did not get searched as it exited Iraq during the US invasion. This Convoy made tracks for Syria and from there the Syrians took possession of the weapons and are shared with Iran.

2006-06-19 13:03:49 · answer #3 · answered by Victor ious 6 · 0 0

The reason there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Very simple we made it clear we were going to invade. Now, how long does it take to move those weapons to oh lets say Syria or even Iran. I am not a fan of any war but lets be rational here. If a drug dealer receives a call from the local police Dept saying they are going to search his house for drugs will he still keep them in his house?

I believe Bush is a true convert to the faith, however his past still haunts him. Espeically big oil companies and he is unable to make the right decesions for the American people based on his past business dealings.

More innocent people have died from other world leaders like Stalin, Hitler, numerous Chinese leaders, most recent and current leaders of Iran and Iraq, Al-Qaeda and yet except for Hitler no one mentions these.

I am tired of America Bashing, we have our share of issues and problems, but there is no place I would rather be a citizen then here. Our free press allows all news to be reported. Perhaps if we were like other countries we could censor the news and only report the good news.

There is plenty of proof of a plane hitting the Pentagon and they just released its video. Our Govt does not need to show pictures of the Pentagon to any eyes out there. I am sure it was viewed to ensure the safety of our National Security and out of respect for those who were murdered that day..

2006-06-19 13:12:05 · answer #4 · answered by mrkenn 2 · 0 0

Actually, according to the video (which has been available on the Net for quite some time unofficially) it was a jet. One that had been confirmed hijacked. There were WMDs in Iraq, all through the 80s and even 90s he used chemical warfare to kill millions of Kurds in his own country (see mass graves) and his enemies in Iran. This was known by everyone, even Bill Clinton, who in 1996 stated that "We KNOW Saddam has WMds..." Why did he throw the UN inspectors out when they weren't completed with their inspection? To move the weapons fool! :)

2006-06-19 12:55:57 · answer #5 · answered by RandyGE 5 · 0 0

There was no plane? I am pretty sure the relatives of the deceased on that flight would love to hear your "theory". As far as the WMD's go. I don't care if we did not find anything. Hussein was a ruthless dictator who slaughtered half a million of his own people. I also could care less about the religious affiliation of anyone. Should we also have just left Hitler alone, until he had the capability to actually destroy the world?

2006-06-19 13:00:54 · answer #6 · answered by bc_munkee 5 · 0 0

Anyone can say that they are a born again Christian but they don't usually live the life. Jesus calls us to be like him and do you think he would be starting wars? He was humble and just like a lamb. I think he was compassionate and caring and loved everyone dispite there beliefs and differences. He came to teach the truth but he didn't force it on anyone. They had a choice whether to accept him or deny him. You cannot compare Bush to a true christian because he doesn't live or act the part now. We should look to Jesus as the truth and the example to follow.

2006-06-19 12:59:12 · answer #7 · answered by Damian 5 · 0 0

I don't know about the christian support of Bush. But it's "coincides". Can you trust any politician? Especially a Bush? I don't think Christianity figures into any plan... only what will appease the moral majority.

However..... The pentagon did get badly damaged in the 9/11 attacks, and many people died. Could you please provide more detail about this part of your statement? I would like to hear what you have to say.

Thanks

2006-06-19 12:58:53 · answer #8 · answered by Bethany 4 · 0 0

Your question bothers me. Aside from the christianity stuff. Did you pay attention at all to the news? I think the other people that responded to this question were right; you have insulted the people whose family died on that flight. As for weapons of mass destruction. It took so long for the UN to get in there to check (sadam wouldnt let them in for a long while). Any retard would know that the only reason he didnt let them in was because he was hiding them (probably in Iran). You better get your facts straight before you start insulting people whose family members died.

2006-06-19 13:35:40 · answer #9 · answered by viperroadster 2 · 0 0

Dorie-

I am a Bible believing Christian and I happen to believe that Bush isn't a Christian at all. He certainly does not act like one. America's flawed international policy is responsible for the terrorism and war in the first place. The basis for individual liberty as espoused in the US Constitution is congruent with the Christian God-given concept of free will. As long as Bush denies the concept of due process, individual liberty, the right to bear arms to [protect oneself against one's own government, EVEN IN IRAQ, for example], clearly illustrate how his methods are completely contrary to both Christianity and the US Constitution. I accept any challenge to the contrary and will be happy to debate the issue. Right wing republicans who claim they stand for freedom simply do not. They stand for fascism. Right wing Republicans who say they are Christians are generally not. They show a spirit of revenge instead of forgiveness. Left wing democrats who claim they stand for freedom do not. They are socialists. Left wing democrats who claim they are Christians are generally not. They tend to be "anything goes" style new-agers who believe that there are many ways to get to heaven. My personal belief is that Libertarianism is the only political philosophy congruent with Christianity. Bush has never been, nor ever will be a Libertarian.

2006-06-19 13:41:13 · answer #10 · answered by coolstyling 1 · 0 0

As Americans we are one nation under God & we are also seperated by church & state in accordance with our Constitution. As Christians, one must have what is called blind faith. God ALLOWS certain things to happen; did you stop to think that maybe God gave mankind a wonderful world & we screwed it up to the point we are now getting a wake up call? HE was there on 9/11 to take those souls home. Three words that people say when face w/a crisis are "God help us" or "Oh My God". Seems to me that it is still hummanity's way of seeking HIM out which is what he wants us to do. Does our Capitol have the words etched into stone : "IN GOD WE TRUST"? Yes it does. I would strongly suggest you pray over this & maybe seek HIM out with your heart & not your head. God is there; you just need to find HIM & accept Jesus as your Savior.

2006-06-19 13:02:57 · answer #11 · answered by betharoo63 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers