What would happen if you died and saw me, jim_darwin, at the pearly gates and only evolutionists get in?

Question

seroiusly just a joke, leave the hell and brimestone for later i beg

Answer 1

I would say, this must be a wrong gate because you only give 10 best answer points only among your buddies :bettierage, huntjames32, atheist candy bc Munkee curious chemical, cornfunkel candy, morpheus

Hey you people who can give 10 points to so stupit things over and over again unless they are gaming???

I really would like to answer only true spiritual questions!!!!

If you do not believe me, go to morpeous or anyone of their bestanswer list and you do the math.

Answer 2

I would get down on my knees, and inspect what the hell I'm standing on. I would check the gates for a manufacturers logo. Then I would try to speak, and ask if anyone speaks english (maybe I already know, because I know only evolutionists get in.) Then I would ask whoever might know, what is inside...can I come back out...can I go anywhere else...who says so...etc...
When I run out of questions, I'll make my best guess at what I should do, and probably have a w'ank before I commit :-)

Answer 3

What do you have with a bus load of attorneys on the backside of the sea??? A rattling nice initiate. Sorry, no megastar, no way a engineer could even get to the pearl gates in the beginning.

Answer 4

You are a very sharp person, but check this out.
Intervention theory is the "almost known" factor in a four-horse race with evolution, creationism, and intelligent design. Exploring it does indeed induce fear in its competitors, which is why it is seldom discussed, and when discussed, it is ridiculed or dismissed outright, This is because today intervention theory stands on a threshold occupied by many other ideas now recognized as "ahead of their time." For example, in 1915 German meteorologist Alfred Wegener proved beyond any reasonable doubt that the earth's surface was composed of giant moveable plates. Wegener had everything except a mechanism for how the plates moved, which we now know was tectonic activity. That missing mechanism allowed his scientific peers to dismiss the obvious truth of his argument because he could not explain why it was true, only that it obviously was true. It took 40 years and the deaths of two generations of "fearful explorers" to legitimize plate tectonics for the truth it always was.

In 1968 Erich Von Daniken first suggested intervention from beyond earth as a means of explaining the blatantly obvious fact that the world's megalithic structures could not be built by humans today, much less by the primitive people of antiquity who supposedly did so. As with Wegener, no one could seriously refute the validity of Von Daniken's arguments. However, also like Wegener, he could not establish a mechanism for how aliens from beyond earth could have created those wonders. Then, in 1976, Zecharia Sitchin provided a mechanism of sorts with his brilliant interpretations of the writings of the ancient Sumerians, in which they spoke freely of "gods" from another planet living among them as their lords and masters. Unfortunately, mainstream science can and does dismiss these 4,000 year old writings on stone tablets as "mythology" that could not possibly be the actual history the Sumerians portrayed them to be.

Now, in 2005, Lloyd Pye offers a new mechanism, modern DNA evidence, to combine with what has previously been put forth by Von Daniken and others, and Sitchin and others. DNA provides conclusive proof of what the Sumerians wrote 4000 years ago when they said that their down-to-earth "gods" created humans and domesticated plants and animals in "a house of fashioning" to "give the gods their ease." In other words, they genetically engineered the things they needed to make life for themselves as easy as possible on what had to be a distant and no doubt difficult outpost far from their home planet. This is now the core of intervention theory, and this is what will prevail against the three current leaders in the race to identify the truth about origins on our planet.

Answer 5

One thing I gotta say for jim_darwin...you're a brave son.

Actually, I have alot more respect for agnostics than I have for outright atheists. Agnostics, for the most part, are honestly searching for real answers.

I have said it before, but it bears repeating. I hope you find the Pearl of Great Price you are seeking for, my friend.

Answer 6

You're going to hell for making fun of St. Peter. You will suffer the seering pain of burning embers. Tortured by the sharp fangs of demonic imps tearing your guts out. God is love.

To answer your question. I'm afraid I'd have to punch in you in the face since you'd be responsible for this crappy violent world. THANKS ALOT JIMGOD. Then I'd make you let me in.

Answer 7

Well, that would make heaven the better party of the two! =0)

Answer 8

Creationists would have to re-create their patterns of thinking and would therefore contribute to evolution within the species.

Answer 9

I think I would be glad to meet you face to face and I would offere to buy you a cup of coffee! Peace!

Answer 10

i thing that would be a heaven worth going to. but only if they have some really nice golf courses