aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaavvaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaavvvvaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaai was bored
2006-06-19 04:01:43 · 16 answers · asked by monkeytracker96 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
NO!!! I was so surprised when people began to think we should pull out!!! We cannot leave until we finish what we are there for; to get Iraq back on it's feet again.
2006-06-19 04:08:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
absolutely!!! know why? coz he find nothing in in iraq right now. everythings that he wanted is already achieved. no WMD, already get saddam, the oil , and then the troops get stuck in iraq because of the civil war. Bush can't manage Iran to be a better country by his OWN hand.
2006-06-19 04:15:06 · answer #2 · answered by putty_tath 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES! It was a major mistake sending them so early, so now he needs to do the right thing and let it work itself out. That doesn't mean leaving the troops in Iraq. That means letting the Iraqi people choose their own destiny.
2006-06-19 04:07:31 · answer #3 · answered by starcent 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush should never of deployed troops to Iraq!
2006-06-19 04:05:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but I agree, not until we get things completed there. We cannot just go in, make a mess then leave before we clean up.
I feel, that he needs to pull more than the troops out though...
2006-06-19 04:07:32 · answer #5 · answered by Girl Next Door 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in the beginning, Bush gained't pull the troops out. He merely isn't president by ability of the time they are out. 2d. Forming a sparkling authorities will be money, time, and lives wasted if we did not stay to help it until eventually it ought to face by ability of itself. Tensions are nevertheless intense, and until eventually the Iraqis have administration we are able to not abandon them. third. those troops (myself blanketed) new what they were signing up for. the armed forces contract does no longer say that you're going to stay at domicile with your relations. It is composed of going to conflict, and serving the position and at the same time as your usa needs you. help for the conflict is down, yet in reality because individuals are impatient. they do no longer understand what it takes or what's excited by installation authorities. the actually everyone appears, more often than not, uninformed or worse, misinformed. The Iraqis nevertheless desire us, no matter if or not they understand it or no longer. and finally, WMD's. Saddam himself idea he had WMD's. the individuals decrease in the chain of command were mendacity to him so that they does no longer be punished, yet that they had no longer yet enhanced the guns he wanted. Their communications indicated that they were transferring the WMD's in the previous the UN replaced into examining, so we (and Saddam) idea that they had them.
2016-10-14 07:30:15 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iran is a country we are hostile to. They are very near Iraq. Infact, we used to be aiding Iraq if im correct against the Iranis. So they also hate Iraq.
If we leave iraq, They could simply march in and claim it for themselves. More land, more resources to bomb us.
Edit:
Oh, and I reported johny roo for a porn site. Next time, use judgement...
2006-06-19 04:06:02 · answer #7 · answered by iam"A"godofsheep 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While I believe that we should have never went in there in the first place, I don't believe we should pull out prematurely. We do, however, need to be more focused on getting the Iraqi government ready for when they are on their own.
2006-06-19 04:18:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
he should pull out the troops, and american people should remit him to the International Court for his his illegal war on Iraq.
2006-06-19 04:41:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No not until the job is done, and the Iraqi people are capable of providing their own security.
The naysayers are the ones who wish to cut and run.
2006-06-19 04:10:13 · answer #10 · answered by aurastin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋