2006-06-19 03:29:02 · 18 answers · asked by bballer9871 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
i firmly believe it should be legal....gov't classifies weed as a sked 1 narcotic....anyone ever looked up what is the definition of a sked 1 narcotic??? it doesn't fit the mold at all...further, how can one ban a substance that occurs naturally and requires NO processing techniques like cocaine and heroin or ecstacy does??? smoke on, it's 4.20 somewhere!!!
2006-06-19 03:36:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I had to do a paper for one of my class about legalizing weed. They say the reason they can't legalize it, is because you can't tax it. Well I feel if you can tax everything else you can find some way of taxing it. Its weird that having weed on you is a bigger offenence then crack or cocaine, or even meth. And to me those are the most dangerous drugs. I think there is some funny business behind that. But I will not get into is. Yes it should be legal, and smoking cigerettes should be illegal
2006-06-19 07:52:41 · answer #2 · answered by dqchild 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Weeds are legal. We have to pull them out of our gardens regularly.
If ya mean POT, then sure. Why not? It's no less unhealthy than other legal chemicals. The psycho-active effects are actually LESS dangerous than with alcohol. How many brawls, murders, rapes, are fueled by pot? Few, if any. It's personally not my thing, but if you're responsible about it's use, then have at it. The hostess cupcake company, and twinkey makers will rake in a FORTUNE if pot's made legal!! l0l
2006-06-20 07:38:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes there would be less crime if everyone was high but like all things there should be a limit you can get high 3 days a week only after 12 in the afternoon and sunday is 3 for 2 day blunts will be handed out by bus drivers at each bus stop to thoise who are willing to buy or trade
2006-06-19 03:35:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, at least for medicinal purposes. Anything that can ease the pain of a terminal cancer patient should be OK. I mean, we already give them powerful opiates, why not weed?
2006-06-19 08:54:09 · answer #5 · answered by JaGa 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-06-19 03:32:36 · answer #6 · answered by N8ball88 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. the main two reasons it is not, are because of the racisim of the early 1920's and the impact it would have on the forestry industry, i.e., paper mills and such.
2006-06-19 03:33:42 · answer #7 · answered by full_tilt_boogie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not there are to many stupid people who believe government anti weed propaganda. alcohol is way worse for you than marijuana. Just shows how brainwashed Americans allow themselves to become.
2016-03-26 21:30:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In some parts of America it already is!
Medical Marijuana should be legal!
2006-06-19 03:39:37 · answer #9 · answered by medicine ball man 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the only reason it is not is because of the revenue created for law enforcement by keeping it illegal. it would be more beneficial to legalize it, but then we would expect police to do actual police work.
2006-06-19 03:34:07 · answer #10 · answered by dude 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋