English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

The original bible of Jesus was what we refer to as the Old Testament in the Bible, or the Torah, from which He quoted many times. It's still very much around.

2006-06-18 17:43:00 · answer #1 · answered by novalee 5 · 0 0

Uh, the Bible as you know it was not written until 1611--and it contained the Apocrypha, which most Protestant Bibles do not currently have. When Jesus refers to "the scriptures," he means the books that we now know as the "Old Testament." Those were the ONLY scriptures that he and his fellow Jews knew of. The New Testament was written, bit by bit, anywhere from 60 years to many centuries after his death (assuming that he ever lived at all). The books that you currently see in your KJV (or whatever) are not the only gospels, epistles, and other writings--there were hundreds of such writings, and most were rejected by groups of MEN who decided for themselves which ones to include or exclude.

2006-06-18 17:48:31 · answer #2 · answered by Antique Silver Buttons 5 · 0 0

The Bible of Jesus.....nope,....never heard of it. You are either a person privileged with unique and previously undisclosed information...or a complete wacko. My choice would be the latter.

2006-06-18 17:43:47 · answer #3 · answered by kleenupman 2 · 0 0

they didn't - it is called the Old Testament today. when Jesus taught, he referenced it constantly ("I didn't come to change the law, but fullfill it"), especially the prophets. He referenced them constantly, so people could see who he was.
The Books of the New Testament were written 30-70 years later by his apostles after he died.

2006-06-18 17:47:45 · answer #4 · answered by Kevin A 4 · 0 0

Because they like to create their own religion without following the concepts from jesus.

2006-06-18 17:38:06 · answer #5 · answered by Answer 4 · 0 0

Jesus did not have a Bible, he had himself God

2006-06-18 19:37:08 · answer #6 · answered by Lion's Blessing 2 · 0 0

It was incredibly inconvenient to those in power at the time, especially since most of the (Roman) Christian clergy had no earthly idea what it was about.

2006-06-18 17:44:29 · answer #7 · answered by abram.kelly 4 · 0 0

Because it benefited whoever threw it away.

2006-06-18 17:41:18 · answer #8 · answered by Steve B 2 · 0 0

what original?

2006-06-18 17:39:23 · answer #9 · answered by changeling 6 · 0 0

Exactly what do you mean by that comment?

2006-06-18 17:42:19 · answer #10 · answered by MrCool1978 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers