English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

I would only oppose it if they don't televise the events.

2006-06-18 12:30:03 · answer #1 · answered by MikeyLikesIt 1 · 0 1

No, that is wrong and inhumane. I vote for turning off the flow of jobs, social services, housing to illegals. Every thing except emergency medical care( and I mean actual emergency, not a cold or something) We need to stop citizenship to children borne of illegals.If they can't get a job or anchor citizenship, they won't come here. Then all we have to worry about is humanely deporting the ones we have now. Maybe they can make their home countries better, since they really do love their home countries alot more than they love this one.

2006-06-19 14:50:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

lol, shows your thinking.

The only flame authorized to burn eternal in our country is the one on JFK's grave.

Enforcement of laws and new law to discourage illegal entry is the key, and to pass laws and repeal court decisions alowing for the colonization and secession of states.

"Prof. Truxillo was born in Albuquerque and educated up through his Ph.D. in the United States. He agrees that the Civil War settled the military question of secession but not the moral question. He believes states have the right to secede and that the federal government will not prevent the establishment of a Hispanic homeland. "It could happen with the support of the U.S. government," he adds."

Look at our Congress and tell me they're not already?

2006-06-18 12:59:04 · answer #3 · answered by yars232c 6 · 0 0

no, that would be bad for the envoirment, It would be cheaper just to bribe the mexican army to stop them.

Of course why not merley hire mexicans to build the fence,

They could do it like they did 1000 years ago, hand tools and block and tackle, it would keep thounds of mexicans busy for years solving both issues.

2006-06-18 12:37:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your living in the past mate, a dinosaur that will die out in time

2006-06-18 12:29:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Haha, I think that would probably help, but you know some people would still try to get past it. Maybe something that killed less people. :) But they would learn, eventually, and it would look pretty cool...

2006-06-18 12:28:56 · answer #6 · answered by Jeremy W 3 · 0 0

If you mean at the border, no, it would be both a waste of energy and overkill (excuse the pun.)

Besides, they would just 'time' it.

2006-06-18 15:46:49 · answer #7 · answered by DAR 7 · 0 0

Only if you promise that they would never come out of it.

2006-06-20 19:36:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

At the moment nearly ANYTHING sounds good to me .... :(

2006-06-18 13:10:59 · answer #9 · answered by Sashie 6 · 0 0

silly child

2006-06-18 12:30:20 · answer #10 · answered by BIG MIKE 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers