English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When the bible refers to Jesus as the "Son of God". Is has the same meaning as Adam being the "so of God" (Matthew 3:38)
This simply mean that God Almighty being the Creator is called the "Father"; while his creation including Jesus are his "sons",

Proof that Jesus was created by God? He is the beginning of God's creation according to Revelations 3:14. He is the first born of all creations according to Colossians 1:15, KJ

Any problem with Jesus being the "Son of God", the beginning of God's creation? Any problem with Jesus being the 2nd in command to Jehovah?

2006-06-18 05:10:10 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

18 answers

Clearly, an honest study of the bible convinces that the Christian God is NOT polytheistic in nature. The Trinity is a Satanic lie.

(Deuteronomy 6:4) Jehovah our God is one Jehovah

(1 Corinthians 8:4-6) There is no God but one. For even though there are those who are called “gods,” whether in heaven or on earth, just as there are many “gods” and many “lords,” there is actually to us one God the Father, out of whom all things are, and we for him

2006-06-18 16:41:41 · answer #1 · answered by achtung_heiss 7 · 1 7

You are missing the duel nature of Christ.
Jesus the Son of man was created by God. He was BORN OF A WOMAN, BORN UNDER THE LAW.
I have a big problem with him being the Son of God at the beginning of creation. That is because that Jesus was the Father incarnate.
When you get to heaven, you will see only Jesus sitting on the ONE throne of heaven, try to find two thrones in the throne room, there is only one.
Who was Jesus Father, The Holy Ghost. So how then is the Father the father unless the Father and the Holy Ghost were one and the same? Still believe the trinity? Try this one.

In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God (Father, Son, Holy Ghost) and the Word was God (Father,Son,Holy Ghost). The Word became flesh and dwelt among men.
We know from Revelation that Jesus is the Word of God so that means that Jesus must be the Father,Son and Holy Ghost in the flesh. If that is true, then he is not number 2, Jehovah Jr., but he is God all by himself. Want to know more? E-mail me for full scripture references.

2006-06-18 05:27:16 · answer #2 · answered by plowmscat 4 · 0 0

Im not sure if I understand your question, but what Im sure of is this:

There are different opinions on how to understand Jesus' role in history. Some think the holy trinity is one: The God, the son (Jesus) and the holy spirit. The three together means the one true God. Some believe the holy trinity is three different figures; the God, his son (Jesus) and the holy spirit.

What do you think? Is what you think the same as what your church think? Have you checked this out for sure?

Other beliefs think that God is God, and that Jesus is a "common" prophet. They are still waiting for the son of the God. And others again think that God does not excist. Jesus might have exicted as a historical person, he might have been a visionaire.

Anyways: nobody can insist their belief is the only right. Not any longer, because we know better than that nowadays.

2006-06-18 05:15:10 · answer #3 · answered by Tones 5 · 0 0

The whole reason that Jesus was crucified was because He claimed to be the Son of God. To the Pharisees and Saducees, Jesus was equating Himself to God...making Himself equal to God. That was the huge blasphemy that the Sanheidren used during the mock trial. They had other problems with Jesus, but saying that you and God were the same was a major issue to them. When Jesus said 'When you have seen me, you have seen the Father.', that is another point claiming equality. Col. is a great proof text for it. So is the Gospel of John when it says that in the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God....further along it says that ...the Word became flesh and dwelled amoungst us. As Jesus took on the mantle of being fully God and fully man, He became a little lower than the angels, for a time and is now exalted! Amen!

2006-06-18 05:27:05 · answer #4 · answered by originaltigger61 6 · 0 0

Every Christian religion believes that Jesus was both the "Son of God" and God himself, in flesh form. This is the role Jesus played in the trinity. Not all Christians believe in the Trinity as God. A few 20th century religions that were only started to protest another religion, sometimes reject the Trinity. Are you in one of these late-era Protest-to-Protestant religions? There's no logic in what you are saying. Also, don't quote the bible unless you can pull out about a hundred infallible verses to back your point that no one can find another verse to contradict. Jesus was not the same "Son of God," as Adam.

2006-06-18 05:22:37 · answer #5 · answered by matticus finch 2 · 0 0

There are lots of places throughout the Bible where people are referred to as God's children, and God as a father.

For example, God often refers to the nation of Israel as his children, and He as their father.

This isn't literal as per the Christian idea of God having sex with a human woman, who then produces God's "son".

(This is most certainly an influence from Greek / Egyptian mythologies where gods are constantly interacting and producing babies with humans who are then half god / half mortal).

Proof for this is in the Synoptic Gospels. In these books, the Jews don't have any problem with Jesus calling himself "son of God" as this can easily be understood within a Jewish context. "Sure, we're all children of God."

By the time the Gospel of John came out, the Church was for the most part a gentile institution, hence these Greek influenced ideas such as Jesus being "part God" or the literal "son of God"..

2006-06-20 16:20:12 · answer #6 · answered by mo mosh 6 · 0 0

Yes, their is. First off, Jesus was supposed to have royal blood from his father, some bloke named Jacob. Ignore this for a while. Jesus (Hay-Suse) was a common name at the time, but not for the Jewish people, which for them was unheard of. Second, if this bloke was the son and the dei is the father, then he would be considered son of dei. Since the Dei is supposed to be immortal, wouldn't the creations of "him" be also? If their was a Jesus, he wasn't Jewish, and if he was son of Dei, then he wouldn't die.

2006-06-18 05:18:37 · answer #7 · answered by Ares Hunter 2 · 0 0

I personally doubt his divinity and that he was really second in command right next to God. I think the idea that he was a child of God like (supposedly) everybody else eventually got contorted into that he was the literal son of God.

2006-06-18 05:16:48 · answer #8 · answered by Joe Shmoe 4 · 0 0

Bible says; "God is not a man... not the son of man.." (Numbers 23:19) Other places contradicts this(?)

2006-06-18 05:15:19 · answer #9 · answered by byefareed 5 · 0 0

1 John 2:22
Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is the anti christ that denieth the Father and the Son

2006-06-18 09:23:11 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No Problem at all! Jesus is THE GOD== He, Jesus even called himself ""I AM""!

2006-06-18 05:14:36 · answer #11 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers